State v. Unwin

Citation68 A. 110,75 N.J.L. 500
PartiesSTATE v. UNWIN.
Decision Date25 November 1907
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

Error to Supreme Court

Harry Unwin was convicted in the First criminal court of Jersey City of violating an act relating to motor vehicles, and brings error from a judgment of the Supreme Court (64 Atl. 163) affirming the conviction. Affirmed.

Frank H. Hall and Charles T. Terry, for plaintiff in error. E. D. Duffield and Robert H. McCarter, Atty. Gen., for the State.

GUMMERE, C. J. This writ of error brings up a judgment of the Supreme Court affirming a conviction had against the plaintiff in error in the First criminal court of Jersey City for violating the provisions of "a supplement to an act entitled 'An act defining motor vehicles, and providing for the registration of the same, and uniform rules regulating the use and speed thereof,'" passed May 26, 1905. P. L. p. 484.

The sole ground upon which the conviction was attacked, both in the Supreme Court and here, was that the act under which it was had contravenes certain provisions of the federal and state Constitutions, and is therefore null and void. The specific grounds upon which plaintiff in error makes this contention are set forth in the opinion delivered in the cause by the Supreme Court, and the conclusion is therein expressed that these grounds are untenable, and that the statute is a valid exercise of the police power of the state. We concur in the conclusion reached by the Supreme Court, and in the reasons therefor expressed in its opinion, except that we do not consider it necessary to determine whether the "registration fee" of $1 required of the owner of a motor vehicle by the first section of the act is in the nature of a license fee, or simply a fee exacted from him as a reasonable charge for the issuing to him of the certificate required by the act and the registering thereof, as in either case the exaction is clearly not a tax upon property, but an exercise of the police power. We observe in the opinion of the Supreme Court a statement of the "law of the road," which seems to us not to be entirely accurate. The provision of the ninety-first section of our road act (Gen. St. p. 2823) requires that drivers of vehicles approaching one another from opposite directions shall each keep to the right when passing, and that when two vehicles are moving in the same direction, and the driver of the one in the rear desires to pass the one in front of him, he shall pass it on its left, the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • National City Bank of New York v. Del Sordo
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • November 29, 1954
    ...such a statute is constitutional. Unwen v. State, 73 N.J.L. 529, 534, 64 A. 163 (Sup.Ct.1906), affirmed sub nom. State v. Unwin, 75 N.J.L. 500, 501, 68 A. 110 (E. & A. 1907). Insofar as subsequent chattel mortgagees of motor vehicles are concerned, the statute imposes a burden of obtaining ......
  • Whaley v. Northern Road Improvement District
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • March 20, 1922
    ... ... The Legislature cannot make ... a valid classification based solely upon residents of a ... fraction of one of the State's subdivisions. It is class ... legislation. 110 Ark. 204; 117 Id. 54; art. 2, ... § 18, Constitution; art. 16, § 11, Id. A ... road district ... ...
  • State v. Smith
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • April 12, 1971
    ...protect the public is well within the police power of the State. Unwen v. State, 73 N.J.L. 529, 64A, 163 (Sup.Ct.1906), aff'd 75 N.J.L. 500, 68A, 110 (E. & A. 1907); Reitz v. Mealey, 314 U.S. 33, 36, 62 S.Ct. 24, 86 L.Ed. 21, 24 (1941); Kane v. New Jersey, 242 U.S. 160, 37 S.Ct. 30, 61 L.Ed......
  • State v. Lawrence
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • May 26, 1913
    ... ... v. Hawkins, 14 Pa. Dist. 592; Commonwealth v ... Densmore, 29 Pa. Co. 217; Christy v. Elliott, ... 215 Ill. 31, 74 N.E. 1035; Union v. State, 73 N. J ... L. 529, 64 A. 163; Claerly v. Johnston, 79 N. J. L ... 49, 74 A. 538; Kane v. Titus (N. J. L. 1911), 80 A ... 145; Unwin v. State (N. J.), 64 A. 163, affirmed in ... 75 N. J. L. 500, 68 A. 1110 ... "Besides ... a general power of regulation, the state has power to impose ... burdens in the nature of taxation upon special occupations or ... special kinds of property with a view rather to regulate than ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT