State v. Villa-Perez, VILLA-PERE
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Missouri |
Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM; ROBERTSON, C.J., COVINGTON, HOLSTEIN, BENTON and THOMAS, JJ., and BLACKMAR; ALBERT L. RENDLEN, Senior Judge, concurs in separate opinion filed. PRICE; ALBERT L. RENDLEN |
Citation | 835 S.W.2d 897 |
Parties | STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Severinoppellant. |
Decision Date | 02 June 1992 |
Docket Number | VILLA-PERE,A,No. 74110 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
90 practice notes
-
State v. Deck, No. 80821
...a motion to suppress and ultimately at trial, the state has the burden to justify a warrantless search and seizure. State v. Villa-Perez, 835 S.W.2d 897, 902 (Mo. banc 1992). In reviewing the trial court's ruling on the matter, this Court considers the record made at the suppression hearing......
-
State v. Edwards, No. SC 84648.
...suppress in the light most favorable to the ruling and defers to the trial court's determinations of credibility. State v. Villa-Perez, 835 S.W.2d 897, 902 (Mo. banc 1992). The inquiry is limited to whether the decision is supported by substantial evidence, and it will be reversed only if c......
-
State v. Miller, No. 76803
...will defer to the trial court's evaluation of the credibility of the witnesses and the weight of the evidence. State v. Villa-Perez, 835 S.W.2d 897, 902 (Mo. banc 1992). We find the trial court erred in overruling appellant's motions to suppress and, therefore, we reverse and remand. III. T......
-
State v. Middleton, Nos. WD
...cert. denied, 506 U.S. 960, 113 S.Ct. 427, 121 L.Ed.2d 348 (1992). This court will neither weigh the evidence, State v. Villa-Perez, 835 S.W.2d 897, 900 (Mo. banc 1992), nor will it determine the reliability or credibility of the witnesses, State v. Hamilton, 817 S.W.2d 8, 11 (Mo.App.1991);......
Request a trial to view additional results
90 cases
-
State v. Deck, No. 80821
...a motion to suppress and ultimately at trial, the state has the burden to justify a warrantless search and seizure. State v. Villa-Perez, 835 S.W.2d 897, 902 (Mo. banc 1992). In reviewing the trial court's ruling on the matter, this Court considers the record made at the suppression hearing......
-
State v. Edwards, No. SC 84648.
...suppress in the light most favorable to the ruling and defers to the trial court's determinations of credibility. State v. Villa-Perez, 835 S.W.2d 897, 902 (Mo. banc 1992). The inquiry is limited to whether the decision is supported by substantial evidence, and it will be reversed only if c......
-
State v. Miller, No. 76803
...will defer to the trial court's evaluation of the credibility of the witnesses and the weight of the evidence. State v. Villa-Perez, 835 S.W.2d 897, 902 (Mo. banc 1992). We find the trial court erred in overruling appellant's motions to suppress and, therefore, we reverse and remand. III. T......
-
State v. Middleton, Nos. WD
...cert. denied, 506 U.S. 960, 113 S.Ct. 427, 121 L.Ed.2d 348 (1992). This court will neither weigh the evidence, State v. Villa-Perez, 835 S.W.2d 897, 900 (Mo. banc 1992), nor will it determine the reliability or credibility of the witnesses, State v. Hamilton, 817 S.W.2d 8, 11 (Mo.App.1991);......
Request a trial to view additional results