State v. Weller
| Decision Date | 09 October 1972 |
| Citation | 501 P.2d 794,263 Or. 132,95 Or.Adv.Sh. 1285 |
| Parties | STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Janet WELLER, Appellant. |
| Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Stephen S. Walker, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.
Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., and John W. Osburn, Sol. Gen., Salem.
Before O'CONNELL, C.J., and DENECKE, HOLMAN, * TONGUE, HOWELL and BRYSON, JJ.
The defendant was convicted of the unlawful possession of marijuana. The Court of Appeals affirmed, State v. Weller, Or.App., 496 P.2d 735 (1972), and we granted the petition for review.
The only issue is whether there was sufficient evidence that the defendant had possession of the marijuana.
There was evidence that the defendant lived in a bedroom on the second story of a residence. The defendant had no other relationship to the residence. Two other bedrooms, which were unoccupied, were on the second floor of the residence. There was also evidence that a man and another woman lived some place in the residence. In one of the unoccupied bedrooms on the second floor pots were found in which recently tended marijuana was growing. The defendant was convicted of the possession of this marijuana.
We said in State v. Oare, 249 Or. 597, 599, 439 P.2d 885, 886 (1968), 'Evidence of the control or the right to control is necessary to constructive possession.' No such evidence is present in this case.
Reversed.
* HOLMAN, J., did not participate in this decision.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Ayers
...815, Sup.Ct. review denied (1971). Constructive possession can be shown by evidence of control or the right to control. State v. Weller, 263 Or. 132, 501 P.2d 794 (1972); State v. Oare, 249 Or. 597, 439 P.2d 885 In State v. Miller, supra, our Supreme Court held that circumstantial evidence ......
-
State v. Barger
...Or. at 599, 439 P.2d 885 (“evidence of the control or the right to control is necessary to constructive possession”); State v. Weller, 263 Or. 132, 501 P.2d 794 (1972) (quoting Oare to same effect); State v. Barnes, 120 Or. 372, 380, 251 P. 305 (1926) (jury could conclude that defendant con......
-
State v. Casey
...and the gun for a brief period of time and, without more, is not sufficient to establish constructive possession. Cf. State v. Weller, 263 Or. 132, 133, 501 P.2d 794 (1972) (evidence that the defendant lived in a bedroom on the second floor of a house occupied by another couple insufficient......
-
State v. Ritchie
...cases—notably State v. Casey, 346 Or. 54, 203 P.3d 202 (2009), State v. Daniels, 348 Or. 513, 234 P.3d 976 (2010), and State v. Weller, 263 Or. 132, 501 P.2d 794 (1972)—that discussed common-law notions of physical and constructive possession and the relevant statutory definition of the ter......