State v. Wilkerson, In re

Decision Date27 November 1974
Citation305 So.2d 382,293 Ala. 774
PartiesIn re STATE v. Faye WILKERSON. Ex parte Faye Wilkerson. SC 1057.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Frank W. Riggs, Montgomery, for petitioner.

No brief for the State.

COLEMAN, Justice.

Petition of Faye Wilkerson for Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in State v. Wilkerson, 54 Ala.App. 104, 305 So.2d 378.

Writ denied.

HEFLIN, C.J., and BLOODWORTH, McCALL and JONES, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • JLN v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • October 25, 2002
    ... ... Wilkerson, 54 Ala.App. 104, 305 So.2d 378, 380, cert. denied, 293 Ala. 774, 305 So.2d 382 (1974), in finding that the appellant could not challenge the constitutionality of a statute because he could not show that the statute's unconstitutional feature adversely affected him, we cited the general rule, ... ...
  • Gavin v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • September 26, 2003
    ... ... Wilkerson, 54 Ala.App. 104, 305 So.2d 378, 380, cert. denied, 293 Ala. 774, 305 So.2d 382 (1974), in finding that the appellant could not challenge the constitutionality of a statute because he could not show that the statute's unconstitutional feature adversely affected him, we cited the general rule, ... ...
  • State v. Woodruff
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • October 9, 1984
    ... ... Wilkerson, 54 Ala.App. 104, 305 So.2d 378, 380, cert. denied, 293 Ala. 774, 305 So.2d 382 (1974), in finding that the appellant could not challenge the constitutionality of a statute because he could not show that the statute's unconstitutional feature adversely affected him, we cited the general rule, as ... ...
  • State v. Kimpel
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • March 3, 1995
    ... ... Woodruff, 460 So.2d 325 (Ala.Cr.App.1984) (reversing trial court, pursuant to § 12-22-91), State v. Spurlock, 393 So.2d 1052 (Ala.Cr.App.1981) (reversing trial court, pursuant to § 12-22-91), State v. Wilkerson, 54 Ala.App. 104, 305 So.2d 378 (reversing trial court, pursuant to the predecessor to § 12-22-91), cert. denied, 293 Ala. 774, 305 So.2d 382 (1974). Although there are several cases in which the Supreme Court has decided a § 12-22-91 issue on direct appeal, State v. Rogers, 281 Ala. 27, 198 ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT