State v. Wilkerson, 124A02.
| Citation | 571 S.E.2d 583 |
| Decision Date | 22 November 2002 |
| Docket Number | No. 124A02.,124A02. |
| Parties | STATE of North Carolina v. Ronnie Hayze WILKERSON. |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.
Lisa Miles, Durham, for defendant-appellant.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.
REVERSED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
51 cases
-
State v. Badgett
...evidence related to a prior conviction for the limited purpose of impeaching a witness. Thus, defendant contends, under State v. Wilkerson, 356 N.C. 418, 571 S.E.2d 583, rev'g per curiam, 148 N.C.App. 310, 559 S.E.2d 5 (2002) (for reasons stated in dissenting opinion, 148 N.C.App. at 318-29......
-
United States v. Thorne
...test." State v. Wilkerson, 559 S.E.2d 5, 17 (N.C. Ct. App. 2002) (Wynn, J., dissenting), rev'd for reasons stated in the dissent, 571 S.E.2d 583 (N.C. 2002) (interpreting state rules of evidence). The state's prohibition on introducing prior convictions was articulated by then-North Carolin......
-
State v. Maready
...that pursuant to State v. Wilkerson, 148 N.C.App. 310, 559 S.E.2d 5, rev'd per curiam for reasons stated in the dissent, 356 N.C. 418, 571 S.E.2d 583 (2002), the trial court erred by admitting into evidence the bare fact of Defendant's prior convictions. In Wilkerson, our Supreme Court adop......
-
State v. Walker
...at an habitual felon proceeding. State v. Lotharp, 148 N.C.App. 435, 444–45, 559 S.E.2d 807, 812,rev'd on other grounds,356 N.C. 420, 571 S.E.2d 583 (2002). Thus, the trial court erred by failing to redact the “irrelevant [convictions] to ensure that the jury would not improperly consider t......
Request a trial to view additional results