State v. Williams

Decision Date30 June 1876
Citation75 N.C. 134
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesSTATE v. WEBSTER WILLIAMS and others.
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Rules of discipline for all voluntary associations must conform to the laws. Hence, when a member of such association refuses to submit to the ceremony of expulsion established by the same, which ceremony involved a battery, it cannot be lawfully inflicted.

(The case of Bell v. Hansley, 3 Jones, 131, cited and approved.)

INDICTMENT for an Assault and Battery, tried before MOORE, J., at Spring Term, 1876, of MARTIN Superior Court.

The defendants and the prosecutrix were members of a benevolent society in Hamiton, N. C., known as the “Good Samaritans,” which Society had certain rules and ceremonies known as the ceremonies of initiation into and expulsion from the Society.

The prosecutrix, having been remiss in some of her obligations, and having been called upon to explain, became violent.

The defendants with others, proceeded to perform the ceremony of expulsion, which consisted in suspending her from the wall by means of a cord fastened around her waist. This ceremony had been performed upon others theretefore, in the presence of the prosecutrix. She resisted to the extent of her ability.

There was conflicting evidence as to whether they lifted her from the floor or intended to treat her differently from others who had been expelled, and it was shown that as soon as she cried out that the cord hurt her, she was released and fainted immediately. Her dress was torn from her.

The defendants' counsel contended that if the defendants only intended to perform the usual ceremony of expulsion and were actuated by no other motive, and did not intend to hurt her, they were not guilty. That in order to commit a crime there must be an unlawful act, coupled with a vicious will.

His Honor held that in any view of the case, if the defendants tied the cord around the waist of the prosecutrix as stated, they were guilty.

There was a verdict of guilty and judgment thereupon. The defendants appealed.

Attorney General Hargrove, for the State .

Mullen & Moore and Walter Clark, for the prisoners .

BYNUM, J.

When the prosecutrix refused to submit to the ceremony of expulsion established by this benevolent Society, it could not be lawfully inflicted. Rules of discipline for this and all voluntary associations must conform to the laws. If the act of tying this woman would have been a battery had the parties concerned not been members of the Society of “Good...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Sanders v. Baggerly
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • 11 Julio 1910
    ...543. Church constitutions are treated as contracts. 2 Sawy. 655; 94 U.S. 523; 2 Daly 239; 4 Abb. N. C. 300; 2 Brewst. 571; 25 Kan. 177; 75 N.C. 134; 11 Phila. 14 Bush 278. Constitutional authority must be shown by those asserting it. 89 Pa. 97; 67 Pa. 138; 5 Am. Rep. 415; 2 Bush 332; 5 Bush......
  • Boyles v. Roberts
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 22 Octubre 1909
    ...98 Mich. 279; White v. Brownell, 2 Daily 329; Venable v. Baptist Church, 25 Kan. 177; Hydes v. Woods, 2 Sawy. 655; State v. Williams, 75 N.C. 134; Protchett v. Schaefer, 11 Phila. 166; Lamb v. Cain, 14 L. R. A. 528; State v. Foraker, 6 L. R. A. 422; Rottman v. Borthing, 22 Neb. 375; Schlich......
  • Russie v. Brazzell
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 30 Marzo 1895
    ... ... of those voting. Bear v. Heasley, 98 Mich. 279; ... Philomath College v. Wyatt, 31 P. 206 (Ore.) ; ... State, etc., v. Sutterfield, 54 Mo. 391; State, ... etc., v. Brassfield, 67 Mo. 331; State, etc., v ... Winkelmier, 35 Mo. 103; Webb v. Lafayette ... 665; White v. Brownell, 2 Daly, ... 329; Ebbinghousen v. Worth Club, 4 Abb. (N. C.) 300; ... Baptist Church, 25 Kan. 177; State v. Williams, 75 ... N.C. 134; Innes v. Wylie, 1 C. and K. 262; ... Orickett v. Schaefer, 11 Phila. 166; Brine v ... Board, 2 Am. Law Reg. 268. The ... ...
  • State v. Adams, 12
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 1 Abril 1980
    ...a prosecution for acts which are breaches of the criminal law. Ange v. Woodmen of the World, 173 N.C. 33, 91 S.E. 586 (1917); State v. Williams, 75 N.C. 134 (1876); Bell v. Hansley, 48 N.C. 131 (1855). Nor is it a valid defense to a criminal charge that other persons have not been prosecute......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT