State v. Williams, 4D06-1902.
Decision Date | 19 September 2007 |
Docket Number | No. 4D06-1902.,4D06-1902. |
Citation | 963 So.2d 281 |
Parties | STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Terrell WILLIAMS, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melanie Dale Surber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tom Wm. Odom, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
The state appeals a downward departure sentence which the trial court imposed for appellee's plea to felony driving while license revoked as a habitual offender. It claims that the grounds alleged were not lawful reasons for departure nor were they proved by a preponderance of the evidence. We agree and reverse.
In a plea hearing on appellee's charges, appellee argued for a downward departure below his lowest permissible guidelines sentence of 21.45 months. Appellee's counsel pointed to appellee's youth (twenty-two), his "confidential diagnosis" of a serious disease, and "extreme duress" based upon the fact that the charges arose after an officer stopped Williams in his car as he was leaving the hospital after the birth of his first child. No evidence was presented on these grounds for departure. The trial court agreed to downward depart based upon appellee's youth and diagnosis and sentenced appellee to 180 days in jail but did not enter a written order specifying the grounds for downward departure.
We articulated the two-step process for departure sentences and their review in Staffney v. State, 826 So.2d 509, 511 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002):
See also Banks v. State, 732 So.2d 1065 (Fla.1999). The trial court erred in determining the first step of the procedure.
The court erred in granting a downward departure, because no evidence was presented to support a departure. The facts supporting a ground for departure must be proved by a preponderance of the evidence. Staffney, 826 So.2d at 511. Where a defendant presents no evidence, he fails to meet the burden of proving a departure factor by a preponderance of the evidence. State v. Silver, 723 So.2d 381, 383 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). In this case, the court only heard the arguments of counsel for both parties—no testimony or evidence was presented. Counsel's unsworn statements presented at a sentencing hearing cannot support a downward departure sentence. State v. Champion, 898 So.2d 1111 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). "Representations of an attorney alone are insufficient to form a valid basis for departure." State v. Bernard, 744 So.2d 1134, 1135 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).
As to the issue of appellant's age, section 921.0026(2)(k), Florida Statutes, permits a downward departure if "at the time of the offense the defendant was too young to appreciate the consequences of the offense." The trial court knew that appellee was age twenty-two, which would hardly place him in the category of being too young to appreciate the consequences of driving with a revoked license. However, even...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Saunders
...no evidence, he fails to meet the burden of proving a departure factor by a preponderance of the evidence." State v. Williams , 963 So. 2d 281, 282 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (citing State v. Silver , 723 So. 2d 381, 383 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) ). And where the defendant fails to meet the burden, the ......
-
State v. Hunt
...the offense, suffered from a mental defect inhibiting his ability to appreciate the consequences of his offenses); State v. Williams, 963 So. 2d 281, 283 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (finding that the defendant's age of twenty-two "would hardly place him in the category of being too young to appreci......
-
State v. Browne
...23 to appreciate the consequences of his offenses." State v. Jerry, 19 So.3d 1167, 1170 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (citing State v. Williams, 963 So.2d 281, 283 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (holding that the defendant being 22 years old "would hardly place him in the category of being too young to apprecia......
-
State v. Jerry
...mental deficit which prevented him from maturing enough by age 23 to appreciate the consequences of his offenses. See State v. Williams, 963 So.2d 281 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (22-year-old defendant "hardly" in category of being too young to appreciate consequences of driving without license); S......