State v. Williams, 26898-8-I
| Decision Date | 29 October 1992 |
| Docket Number | No. 26898-8-I,26898-8-I |
| Citation | 840 P.2d 902 |
| Court | Washington Court of Appeals |
| Parties | STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. John Louis WILLIAMS, Appellant. |
Washington Appellate Defender, Andrew Stanton, Seattle, for appellant.
Norm Maleng, King County Pros. Atty., David Merrell, Seattle, for respondent.
On its own motion, pursuant to RAP 12.9(b) the court hereby recalls its mandate to correct an inadvertent mistake contained in the opinion filed herein on May 4, 1992.
It is further ordered that said opinion 65 Wash.App. 456, 828 P.2d 1158, is hereby changed as follows: on page [third paragraph column two of page 1159 of 828 P.2d] delete the first sentence of the [fourth] paragraph which states, "Sentencing took place before Judge Downing on August 17, 1990." Substitute the following: "Sentencing took place before Judge Bridge on August 17, 1990."
There are no other corrections to the opinion. There having been no petitions for reconsideration or review, the court's mandate shall promptly be reissued following the correction aforementioned.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Mathers
...(2013) ; State v. Thompson, 153 Wash.App. 325, 336, 223 P.3d 1165 (2009) ; State v. Williams, 65 Wash.App. 456, 460, 828 P.2d 1158, 840 P.2d 902 (1992).¶ 9 Washington courts consistently treat the DNA and the VPA statutes as separate and distinct from the discretionary LFO statute and the r......
-
State v. Conway, 50032-9-II
...(2013) ; State v. Thompson, 153 Wash. App. 325, 337, 223 P.3d 1165 (2009) ; State v. Williams, 65 Wash. App. 456, 460, 828 P.2d 1158, 840 P.2d 902 (1992). ¶12 "Washington courts consistently treat the [mandatory LFO] statutes as separate and distinct from the discretionary LFO statute and t......
-
State v. Gates
...first time on appeal, he can seek relief at the trial court level. Gates argues that State v. Williams, 65 Wn.App. 456, 828 P.2d 1158, 840 P.2d 902 (1992), requires reversal where sentencing court did not inquire into the defendant's financial resources before imposing costs. First, that ca......
-
State Of Wash. v. Gates
...time on appeal, he can seek relief at the trial court level. Gates argues that State v. Williams, 65 Wn. App. 456, 828 P.2d 1158, 840 P.2d 902 (1992), requires reversal where a sentencing court did not inquire into the defendant's financial resources before imposing costs. First, that case ......