State v. Williams, A95A2412
Decision Date | 06 February 1996 |
Docket Number | No. A95A2412,A95A2412 |
Citation | 469 S.E.2d 261,220 Ga.App. 100 |
Parties | The STATE v. WILLIAMS. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
John R. Parks, District Attorney, Richard E. Nettum, Assistant District Attorney, for appellant.
Mark G. Pitts, for appellee.
Gregory Williams was indicted for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. The State appeals from the trial court's order granting Williams's motion to suppress. For reasons which follow, we affirm.
Viewed in a light to support the trial court's ruling, the evidence showed that Officers Ethridge and Sapp stopped two cars, one for a broken taillight and the other for no license plate. While Ethridge tended to the car with no tag, Sapp watched the other car which contained Williams and his co-defendant, Flemming Martin. When Ethridge finished with the first car, Sapp told him that he saw the driver of the second car hand the passenger "money and something else" and the passenger put what he had been handed in his pocket. Ethridge then removed the passenger, Williams, from the car and asked what he had been handed by the driver, Martin. Ethridge also asked whether Williams was carrying a weapon, and Williams responded that he was not. Ethridge testified that fearing for his safety, he then patted down Williams for weapons. While doing so, Ethridge felt an object "like a bag with something in it" in Williams's pants pocket and asked Williams what it was. Williams responded that it was only money. Ethridge testified that he "knew there was something in there other than money" and that "for everybody's safety" he therefore handcuffed Williams. Ethridge then reached into Williams's pocket and pulled out money and a clear plastic bag containing marijuana.
Ethridge admitted that during the pat-down, he did not feel anything that felt like a typical weapon such as a knife, gun, stick, pepper spray, or mace. When asked whether he felt anything that felt like an atypical weapon, Ethridge responded,
1. The State never argues that the motion to suppress should have been denied because Ethridge's continued search was authorized as a protective weapons search under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). Rather, citing Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366, 113 S.Ct. 2130, 124 L.Ed.2d 334 (1993), it argues that the seizure of the plastic bag was valid because its contraband nature was readily apparent to Ethridge. We disagree.
In Dickerson, the Supreme Court held that the "plain feel" corollary to the "plain view" doctrine allows an officer to seize contraband which is plainly identified through the officer's sense of touch during a valid Terry pat-down: "If a police officer lawfully pats down a suspect's outer clothing and feels an object whose contour or mass makes its identity immediately apparent, there has been no invasion of the suspect's privacy beyond that already authorized by the officer's search for weapons; if the object is contraband, its warrantless seizure would be justified by the same practical considerations that inhere in the plain view context." (Emphasis supplied; footnote omitted.) Id. 508 U.S. at 375-76, 113 S.Ct. at 2137, 124 L.Ed.2d at 346. Applying these principles to the particular facts of the case, however, the Supreme Court in Dickerson ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re C.C.
...lead a law enforcement officer of reasonable caution to believe an offense had been or is being committed"); State v. Williams, 220 Ga. App. 100, 469 S.E.2d 261, 263 (1996) (affirming trial court's suppression of evidence because object's contour did not make itself readily apparent to offi......
-
Corley v. State, A98A2018.
...under Terry v. Ohio, supra, to intrude into Corley's watch pocket by directing him to remove its contents. State v. Williams, 220 Ga.App. 100, 101-102(1), 469 S.E.2d 261 (1996); Barrett v. State, 212 Ga.App. 745, 748-749, 443 S.E.2d 285 (b) Our analysis does not end here, however, because t......
-
Pickens v. State
...findings of fact " 'will not be disturbed if there is any evidence to support them.' " (Citation omitted.) State v. Williams, 220 Ga.App. 100, 102(2), 469 S.E.2d 261 (1996). Kitty Smith, assistant manager of a motel in an area where such establishments were "notorious" for drug and prostitu......
-
Boatright v. State
...contraband which is plainly identified through the officer's sense of touch during a valid Terry pat-down." State v. Williams, 220 Ga.App. 100, 101(1), 469 S.E.2d 261 (1996). "If a police officer lawfully pats down a suspect's outer clothing and feels an object whose contour or mass makes i......