State v. Wright
Citation | 76 Conn.App. 91,818 A.2d 824 |
Decision Date | 08 April 2003 |
Docket Number | No. 21830.,21830. |
Court | Appellate Court of Connecticut |
Parties | STATE of Connecticut v. Travis L. WRIGHT. |
Joseph A. Moniz, special public defender, for the appellant (defendant).
Eileen F. McCarthy, senior assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were David I. Cohen, state's attorney, and James Bernardi, supervisory assistant state's attorney, for the appellee (state).
The defendant, Travis L. Wright, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-55 (a). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied his motion to suppress his confession, (2) excluded portions of his psychological records and (3) gave two "Chip Smith" charges to the jury, depriving him of his constitutional rights to due process and an uncoerced jury verdict. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. On April 11, 1999, the lifeless body of Wieston Tarnowski, a victim of multiple stab wounds, was found in an abandoned vehicle in Stamford. While being interviewed at the Stamford police station following his arrest on June 25, 1999, on a charge of attempt to commit robbery, the defendant was asked about the Tarnowski homicide, and he indicated that he knew about the stabbing of a man in the south end of Stamford. The defendant subsequently confessed to twice stabbing a man in the chest after that man attacked him. The defendant told the police that he left that man in a vehicle in the area of Rockland Place and Atlantic Street in Stamford.
After a jury trial, the defendant was found not guilty of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53-54a and guilty of manslaughter in the first degree, as a lesser offense included within murder, in violation of § 53a5-5 (a) and sentenced to seventeen years incarceration. This appeal followed.
The defendant first claims that the court improperly denied his pretrial motion to suppress the confession that he gave to the police. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly failed to base its decision on the totality of the circumstances surrounding that confession.1 We disagree.
After a hearing on the motion to suppress, the court found the following facts in its memorandum of decision. "On June 25, 1999, Officer Michael Merenda of the Stamford police department went to the area of Spruce Street in Stamford, at approximately 6-6:15 a.m., on the report of a robbery. He had a description of several suspects who may have been involved in the robbery. Merenda saw three black males near the area of Fairfield Court matching this description who, upon seeing him, fled. One of the three was the defendant, who then came to a stop. Merenda detained the defendant pending further investigation.
The court further found the following facts: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Houghtaling, AC 35720
...He does not argue that he did not understand or that he had any trouble communicating with the officers. See State v. Wright, 76 Conn. App. 91, 108, 818 A.2d 824 (2003) (considering totality of circumstances, including that "[a]t no time did the defendant reveal that he did not understand h......
-
State v. Houghtaling
...drawn. He does not argue that he did not understand or that he had any trouble communicating with the officers. See State v. Wright, 76 Conn.App. 91, 108, 818 A.2d 824 (2003) (considering totality of circumstances, including that “[a]t no time did the defendant reveal that he did not unders......
-
State v. Linarte
...the totality of the circumstances of the claimed waiver." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Wright, 76 Conn.App. 91, 99-100, 818 A.2d 824 (2003), cert. denied, 267 Conn. 911, 840 A.2d 1175 In June, 2003, the defendant filed a motion to suppress his signed confes......
-
State v. Moreno
... ... about a confession to a serious crime that is not freely ... self-determined. State v. Doyle , 104 Conn.App. 4, ... 17, 931 A.2d 393, cert. denied, 284 Conn. 935, 935 A.2d 152 ... (2007). In State v. Wright , 76 Conn.App. 91, 818 ... A.2d 824, cert. denied, 267 Conn. 911, 840 A.2d 1175 (2004), ... the court held that " encouraging a suspect to tell the ... truth ... does not, as a matter of law, overcome a ... confessor's will ... neither is a statement that the ... ...