State v. Yelsen Land Co.
| Decision Date | 05 January 1972 |
| Docket Number | No. 19346,19346 |
| Citation | 257 S.C. 401,185 S.E.2d 897 |
| Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | The STATE of South Carolina, Appellant, v. YELSEN LAND COMPANY, Inc., et al., Respondents. |
Atty. Gen. Daniel R. McLeod, and Asst. Atty. Gen. Edward B. Latimer, Columbia, and Edward D. Buckley, of Bailey & Buckley, Charleston, for appellant.
Edwin P. Gardner, of Sloan & Gardner, Columbia, and J. Kenneth Rentiers and Carl E. Renken, Charleston, for respondents.
This action was commenced by the State of South Carolina to settle a dispute concerning ownership and control of certain tidelands, submerged lands, and waters adjacent to Morris Island in Charleston Harbor. The State seeks to enjoin the defendants from trespassing upon the property involved, and seeks confirmation of title to the land in the State.
By way of answer and counterclaim, defendants assert title to the area in question, and allege that the State has trespassed upon it. They seek judgment confirming title in themselves, and seek monetary damages for wrongful taking, forbidden by the constitution. They also seek attorney fees and an injunction against the State. Their claim of title to the area stems from grants by the State of South Carolina to their predecessors in title.
After the case had been placed on the calendar for a jury trial, and the case reached for trial on the roster, the judge, on his own motion and over the objection of the State, referred all issues for trial to the Master in Equity for Charleston County. The State duly excepted to this order of reference and has appealed.
The sole question raised on this appeal is whether the judge erred in ordering the issues tried by the master instead of by a jury.
The complaint in this action asserts that 'Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law and therefore brings this action in equity. . . .' Defendants Yelsen Land Company, Inc. and Dajon Realty Company likewise assert in their answer and counterclaim that 'Defendants have no adequate remedy at law to prevent further trespass . . ..' Defendants contend that all parties have alleged this to be a matter in equity, and that a trial by jury has therefore been waived.
The State's assertion that it 'has no adequate remedy at law' was, perhaps, unfortunate. Obviously it referred to the injunctive relief sought, which is purely equitable. But the character of an action is not necessarily determined by such recitations in the pleadings. Rather, it is the nature of the issues and the remedies which are sought that is determinative.
A great many actions are of a hybrid nature. They involve not only issues normally tried by a jury, but also issues normally tried in equity without a jury.
This court noted in Airfare, Inc. v. Greenville Airport Commission, 249 S.C. 265, 153 S.E.2d 846 (1967), that
Both the State and the defendants seek injunctive relief in this action. An action for such relief is equitable. Airfare, Inc., v. Greenville Airport Commission, Supra.
But both the State and the defendants assert title to the tidelands here in question. And when an issue of title to real estate is raised, such issue is generally triable by jury. Norwood v. Bryant, 253 S.C. 551, 172 S.E.2d 108 (1970); Hutto v. Hutto, 189 S.C. 26, 199 S.E. 909 (1938)...
To continue reading
Request your trial
- State v. Pilot Life Ins. Co.
-
State v. Hardee
...and private ownership as witnessed by the recent case of Lane v. McEachern, 251 S.C. 272, 162 S.E.2d 174, and by the case of State v. Yelsen Land Co., 185 S.E.2d 897, decided this year, wherein it was held that in a controversy as to the title of tidelands the State, as well as a private cl......
-
Pinckney v. City of Beaufort
...A reading of the cases reveals the relief sought in each case was an injunction 2 which is cognizable in equity. State v. Yelsen Land Co., 257 S.C. 401, 185 S.E.2d 897 (1972) (action for injunctive relief is equitable); Riley v. Town of Greenwood, 72 S.C. 90, 51 S.E. 532 (1905). The relief ......
-
Yelsen Land Co. v. State
...of title to the land should be tried to a jury and that the trial judge erred in denying the State a jury trial. State v. Yelsen Land Co., 257 S.C. 401, 185 S.E.2d 897 (1972). The jury returned a general verdict for the State, having been charged that title to tidelands, submerged lands, an......