Stauffer v. Johnson, 2578
Decision Date | 07 July 1953 |
Docket Number | No. 2578,2578 |
Citation | 259 P.2d 753,71 Wyo. 386 |
Parties | STAUFFER, v. JOHNSON et al. |
Court | Wyoming Supreme Court |
M. A. Kline and Arthur Kline of Kline & Kline, Cheyenne, for appellant.
Clarence W. Cook and P. W. Spaulding, Evanston, for respondents.
By these direct appeal proceedings a review is sought of a judgment of the District Court of Uinta County. That court affirmed a ruling of the State Board of Land Commissioners hereinafter usually mentioned as the 'Board' granting a lease of the School Section 36 Township 13, N., Range 120, West of the 6th P.M., to Milton A. Johnson, the old lessee, in a lease which expired March 1st, 1950. Appellant J. C. Stauffer filed on February 15th, 1950, with the Land Commissioner, usually to be mentioned as the 'Commissioner' a conflicting application for the lease of this land. The application of the old lessee and his wife was filed with the commissioner aforesaid on January 9th, 1950.
The parties to this controversy will usually be referred to as follows: the old lessee as the 'appellee' or by his name, 'Milton A. Johnson' and the rival applicant as the 'appellant' or by his name, 'J. C. Stauffer.' The ruling of the Board affirmed the decision of the Commissioner.
The applicants for the lease in question here are Milton A. Johnson and his wife, Gweneth M. Johnson of Evanston, Wyoming, who made a yearly rental offer of $256; the yearly rental on the old lease was $195. J. C. Stauffer of Willard, Utah, tendered a yearly rental offer of $3,500.
The Land Commissioner prior to his disposition of the contest also set out certain information derived from the several applications of these parties as follows:
'Applicant Stauffer reports improvements on which he placed an estimated valuation of $4,000.00 and that amount accompanied his application as the estimated value of the improvements on the Section.
'Stock Water: There is stock water on the Section applied for furnished by Mill Creek.
* * *
* * *
As to the application by Stauffer the Commissioner said:
'Applicant J. C. Stauffer owns land which adjoins the Section in conflict on the south and part of his deeded land is about one-half mile southwest of the Section. He owns 900 head of beef cattle. He desires to lease the land for grazing purposes.
'The following letter accompanied his application:
Cheyenne, Wyoming.
Gentlemen:
I am enclosing herewith an application to lease All of Section 36, Township 13 North, Range 120 West, which I have sub-leased for the years of 1946, 1947, and 1948, for which I have paid $10,000.00 for most of the mentioned section.
I am enclosing my check for $7503.00 as the initial payment and deposit for improvements as set forth in the lease application.
'He offered $3,500 a year for the Section or about $5.47 an acre.'
In disposing of this contest the Commissioner stated:
'The application of J. C. Stauffer is disallowed.'
In due time Stauffer appealed from the Commissioner's decision to the Board. Explaining the position in which the appellees stood before the Board they filed May 15th, 1950, with the Commissioner an 'Answer to the Appeal to the Board of Land Commissioners' filed by Stauffer. Among other things the appellees stated:
'4. Milton A. Johnson and Gweneth Johnson, his wife, Appellees herein, are the old lessees under Lease No. 3-4899, have had, and now do have actual and necessary use for said Common School Land, and tney have been and in the future intend to be dependent upon the use of said Common School Land for their livelihood; and they, Milton A. Johnson and Gweneth Johnson, his wife, are lawful occupants of lands adjoining the above described lands as will be hereinafter shown, and have paid the annual rental charged by the Board of Land Commissioners for the use thereof; they and each of them are now bona fide resident citizens of the State of Wyoming, County of Unita, and are qualified to lease the subject lands, and that they previously held the subject lands under an approved assignment from Appellee Milton A. Johnson's father, J. A. Johnson, dated June 2, 1947; Appellees predecessor in interest, said J. A. Johnson having first obtained a lease upon the subject lands in January 15, 1921, and until the date of assignment above mentioned enjoyed uninterrupted possession thereof; and that since the date of assignment, Appellees Johnson have paid rentals thereupon when due, have not violated the provision of said lease and are entitled to and hereby assert and claim a preferred right to renew said lease upon the above described lands upon the terms prescribed by the Board of Land Commissioners.
'5. Appellees Johnson further show the Board that their private property holdings adjacent to and nearby Section 36, Township 13 North Range 120 West of the 6th P.M., the challenged section, are as follows:
"The East One-Half of Section 25, Township 13 North, Range 120 West of the 6th P.M., All of Section 30, 31, 17; 355 Acres in the East One-Half Section 19; West One-Half of Section 16; the West One-Half of Section 20, part of which is Taylor Grazing Land; and the West One-Half of the East One-Half of Section 8, part of which is Taylor Grazing Land, all in Township 13 North, Range 119 West of the 6th P.M., as is shown by Exhibit 'A' hereto appended, a total of 4035 acres, more or less, together with all buildings, improvements and fencing thereon',
'Appellee Johnson's Ranch Operating Plan, identical to that of his father and predecessor in interest, proved to be the most beneficial and practical plan to all parties in interest by some thirty (30) years of experience hereon, has been to use their entire interest above described as a single unit, said single unit having as its base, integral and focal point said Section 36, Section herein under question.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rayburne v. Queen
...opinions of this court have held pasturage arrangements not to be within the prohibition against subleasing and cites Stauffer v. Johnson, 71 Wyo. 386, 259 P.2d 753, and Hawks v. Creswell, 60 Wyo. 1, 144 P.2d 129, as authority for her position. An analysis of these cases does not indicate t......
-
Mahoney v. L. L. Sheep Co.
...meant to make it the policy of the State in leasing its land to recognize existing equities of the applicants. See Stauffer v. Johnson, 71 Wyo. 386, 259 P.2d 753, 763; and Kerrigan v. Miller, 53 Wyo. 441, 84 P.2d 724, 729. To list the amount of land as a factor here, if an error at all, is ......
-
Frolander v. Ilsley, 2609
...her own land to another, and the need of the tenant was treated the same as the need of the landlord. In the recent case of Stauffer v. Johnson, Wyo., 259 P.2d 753, we held that for a lessee from the state to permit pasturing on the leased land by the livestock of another for a consideratio......
-
Bosler v. McKechnie
...lands, were separately and in fact leased so far as concerned the meadow lands on each would be a mere guess. * * *' In Stauffer v. Johnson, 71 Wyo. 386, 259 P.2d 753, the late Justice Riner considered at length the question as to whether permitting temporary pasturing of leased ground was ......