Stein v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
| Decision Date | 19 April 1966 |
| Parties | Norma M. STEIN and Hugo B. Stein, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC., Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
C. P. Duffy, New York City, for plaintiffs-respondents.
J. M. Downing, New York City, for defendant-appellant.
Before BREITEL, J.P., and RABIN, McNALLY, STEVENS and STEUER, JJ.
Judgment unanimously reversed on the facts and the law and a new trial ordered with $50 costs and disbursements to abide the event. Plaintiff wife sues for damages for personal injuries resulting from a fall in defendant's terminal building at Idlewild Airport. Her husband's action is for medical expense and loss of services. We find there was prejudicial error in the exclusion of testimony. Defendant offered to prove that many thousands of people had traversed the area which plaintiff claimed to be dangerous without any accident. Such evidence is relevant and often persuasive on the question of whether a given condition should be classified as dangerous (Stratton v. City of New York, 190 N.Y. 294, 83 N.E. 40; Murray v. City of New York, 276 App.Div. 765, 92 N.Y.S.2d 539; Charanis v. R. H. Macy & Co., Inc., 257 App.Div. 980, 13 N.Y.S.2d 168). Furthermore, the finding of the jury was against the weight of the evidence. Plaintiff's testimony as to the condition of the flooring was extremely vague on the vital point, namely, the depth of the alleged crack, and is discredited by her ignorance of the conditions, including the material of which the floor was composed. Defendant's testimony as to the conditions was supported by the photographs in evidence. Lastly, the verdict was grossly excessive. The injury was a linear fracture of the second metatarsal with no displacement. A cast was applied for 17 days. Medical expense was $101. There were no significant residuals. The awards of $14,000 and $3,000 cannot be sustained. Order filed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Demarco v. Demarco
...276, 277, 808 N.Y.S.2d 9 [2005] ; Pearson v. Carraturo, 210 A.D.2d 387, 388, 620 N.Y.S.2d 95 [1994] ; Stein v. Trans World Airlines, 25 A.D.2d 732, 732, 268 N.Y.S.2d 752 [1966] ).ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.EGAN JR., J.P., LYNCH and MULVEY, JJ., ...
-
Christoforou v. Lown
... ... This Court stated in Stein v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 25 A.D.2d 732, 268 N.Y.S.2d ... ...
-
Ducrepin v. U.S.
... ... Big v. Supermarkets, Inc., 177 A.D.2d 846, 847, 576 N.Y.S.2d 461, 462-63 (3d ... 596, 60 S.Ct. 132, 84 L.Ed. 499 (1939); see also Stein v. Trans World Airlines, 25 A.D.2d 732, 268 N.Y.S.2d 752, ... ...
-
LEWIS v. SUN TIME Corp. d/b/a Prime Time
...persons descended the same stairs without incident. 1 McCormick on Evidence § 200 and n. 30 (citing “ Stein v. Trans World Airlines, 25 A.D.2d 732, 268 N.Y.S.2d 752 (1966) (error to exclude evidence that many thousands had walked through same area in air terminal without slipping); Erickson......