Stewart v. People
| Decision Date | 02 December 1929 |
| Docket Number | 12343. |
| Citation | 283 P. 47,86 Colo. 456 |
| Parties | STEWART v. PEOPLE. |
| Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied Dec. 23, 1929.
In Department.
Error to District Court, City and County of Denver; George W Bruce, Judge.
Allen G. Stewart was convicted of an attempt to obtain money from an insurance company by means of the confidence game, and he brings error.
Affirmed.
F. D Taggart, of Denver, for plaintiff in error.
Robert E. Winbourn, Atty. Gen., and E. J Plunkett, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
Allen G. Stewart was convicted of an attempt to obtain money from an insurance company by means of the confidence game.
1. The court denied Stewart's application for a bill of particulars. Such denial is said to be reversible error. It is within the sound discretion of the trial court to grant or deny such applications, and there is nothing in the record to indicate that the court's discretion in this case was abused.
2. No evidence was introduced on behalf of Stewart. It is claimed that the evidence fails to prove the charge contained in the information, that at most it tended to prove an attempt to obtain money from the company by false pretense, and our attention is called to decisions to the effect that to constitute the offense charged here the attempt must have been made to obtain the money by some false or bogus means token, symbol, or device, as distinguished from mere words, however false and fraudulent.
The undisputed evidence--Stewart introduced no evidence--is to the following effect: Stewart obtained a policy from the company insuring his against loss by theft of his automobile and its accessories. He thereafter filed with the company a written and signed statement that two spare wheels, tires and tubes belonging to the automobile had been stolen, and sought to collect the amount of the loss. He also reported the loss at police headquarters. Acting on information communicated by a stranger, two police officers went to Stewart's residence. Stewart was engaged in packing his personal belongings, preparing, his counsel says, to make a trip with his automobile to Seattle, Wash. The officers searched the premises. In the chicken coop they found one of the wheels and one of the tires. The other wheel they found in the bottom of a barrel, covered with gunny sacks and a tarpaulin. When asked why he hid the wheels, Stewart made an explanation that was ridiculous on...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Howe v. People, 24650
...Self v. People, Supra; Balltrip v. People, 157 Colo. 108, 401 P.2d 259; Johnson v. People, 110 Colo. 283, 133 P.2d 789; Stewart v. People, 86 Colo. 456, 283 P. 47. In our view, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in not requiring a formal bill of particulars under the circumstances......
-
Balltrip v. People, 20562
...for bills of particulars, and its action will not be disturbed on writ of error in the absence of an abuse of discretion. Stewart v. People, 86 Colo. 456, 283 P. 47. There is no abuse of discretion in denying a motion for a bill of particulars where the information sufficiently advises the ......
-
Olde v. People
... ... difficult to argue in favor of the validity of the instant ... judgment,' but suggests that the acceptance of the ... Illinois cases above cited as precedents in Bomareto v ... People, supra, in effect overrules a line of earlier ... decisions of this court, particularly Stewart v ... People, 86 Colo. 456, 283 P. 47; Roll v ... People, 78 Colo. 589, 243 P. 641; Powers v ... People, 53 Colo. 43, 123 P. 642, and West v ... People, 60 Colo. 488, 156 P. 137. We are in accord with ... the initial observation of the Attorney General, and so ... conclude the judgment ... ...
-
Self v. People
...been shown, and therefore, the court's ruling is not subject to reversal. Johnson v. People, 110 Colo. 283, 133 P.2d 789; Stewart v. People, 86 Colo. 456, 283 P. 47. The defendant was fairly apprised of the offense charged against him. The crime of being an accessory after the fact, as defi......