Stoganovic v. DiNolfo
| Citation | 473 N.Y.S.2d 972,462 N.E.2d 149,61 N.Y.2d 812 |
| Parties | , 462 N.E.2d 149 Mike STOGANOVIC et al., Appellants, v. Pat V. DiNOLFO, Respondent. |
| Decision Date | 16 February 1984 |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (92 A.D.2d 729, 461 N.Y.S.2d 121).
SIMONS, J., took no part.
To continue reading
Request your trial
39 cases
- Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Com'n v. Crawford
- Layton v. Howard County
-
People v. Art Steel Co., Inc.
...the Appellate Division in Sasso did not address section 198-c because of the intervening decision of the Court of Appeals in Stoganovic v. Dinolfo, supra, (106 A.D.2d 132 at 141, 482 N.Y.S.2d 875). Plaintiffs did not challenge that portion of the Appellate Division's order which directed di......
-
CPC Intern. Inc. v. McKesson Corp.
...78 N.Y. 310, contrast with Carpenter v. City of Plattsburgh, 66 N.Y.2d 791, 497 N.Y.S.2d 909, 488 N.E.2d 839; Stoganovic v. Dinolfo, 61 N.Y.2d 812, 473 N.Y.S.2d 972, 462 N.E.2d 149; Drinkhouse v. Parka Corp., 3 N.Y.2d 82, 164 N.Y.S.2d 1, 143 N.E.2d 767; Steitz v. City of Beacon, 295 N.Y. 51......
Request a trial to view additional results