Stone v. Buckley

Decision Date06 April 1960
Docket NumberNo. 1389,1389
Citation119 So.2d 298
PartiesAubrey G. STONE, Appellant, v. Jack R. BUCKLEY and Mary June Buckley, Partners, doing business as Buckley's Crane Service, Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Muscarella and Perenich, Clearwater; and Fowler, White Gillen, Humkey and Trenam, Tampa, for appellant.

Fred T. Saussy, Jr., Tampa, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The case about which this appeal is concerned is one at common law. The appeal is from an order granting a motion for summary judgment filed by the defendants in the trial court. The decretal part of the order reads:

'Ordered and adjudged that the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendants, Jack R. Buckley and Mary June Buckley, copartners trading under the firm name of Buckley's Crane Service, be, and the same is, hereby, granted.'

There has been no final judgment entered consequent upon the order granting the motion just recited. The order thus appealed from is not a final adjudication nor does it come within the exception provided for under Rule 4.2, subd. a. Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A., which permits an interlocutory order at common law to be appealed when it relates to venue or jurisdiction over the person. See Chastain v. Embry, Fla.App.1960, 118 So.2d 33; Baker v. Colley, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 473; and Renard v. Kirkeby Hotels, Inc., Fla.App.1958, 99 So.2d 719. We raise sua sponte the question as to the appealability of the order. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

ALLEN, C. J., and KANNER and SHANNON, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Washington Sec. Co. v. Tracy's Plumbing & Pumps, Inc., 4542
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 5 août 1964
    ...judgment, the order is not final and is not appealable. See e. g. Williams v. Maddren, Fla.App.1962, 147 So.2d 572; Stone v. Buckley Fla.App.1960, 119 So.2d 298; Chastain v. Embry, Fla.App.1960, 118 So.2d 33; Renard v. Kirkeby Hotels, Inc., Fla.App.1958, 99 So.2d 719; Brannon v. Johnson, Fl......
  • Pompano Paint Co. v. Pompano Beach Bank & Trust Co.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 19 mars 1968
    ...under F.A.R. 3. Chastain v. Embry, Fla.App.1960, 118 So.2d 33; Pinellas County v. Woolley, Fla.App.1966, 189 So.2d 217; Stone v. Buckley, Fla.App.1960, 119 So.2d 298; Renard v. Kirkeby Hotels, Inc., Fla.App.1958, 99 So.2d 719; Florida Living for the Retired, Inc. v. Retirement Hotel Associa......
  • Shupack v. Allstate Ins. Co., 77-407
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 28 mars 1978
    ...2d DCA 1971); Arnold v. Brady, 178 So.2d 732 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965); Lyden v. DePiera, 147 So.2d 573 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962); Stone v. Buckley, 119 So.2d 298 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960); Chastain v. Embry, 118 So.2d 33 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960); Elliott v. Lazar, 104 So.2d 618 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958); and Renard v. Kirk......
  • Ballard v. Hopkins, 2716
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 20 juin 1962
    ...judgment is not a final judgment from which an appeal may be taken. Chastain v. Embry, Fla.App.1960, 118 So.2d 33; Stone v. Buckley, Fla.App.1960, 119 So.2d 298. The fact that the lower court entered a 'nunc pro tunc' final judgment cannot give validity or invalidity to notice of appeal. In......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT