Stone v. State

Decision Date11 June 1892
Citation19 S.W. 968,56 Ark. 345
PartiesSTONE v. STATE
CourtArkansas Supreme Court

APPEAL from Garland Circuit Court, A. M. DUFFIE, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of an assault and battery, committed on Lena Walton. The facts were as follows:

Eliza Johnson testified: "I live in the city of Hot Springs. I know Lena Walton. She is a colored woman and lived near my house last spring. About the first of March she and a man who was living with her were creating a disturbance by cursing and loud talking, and I went for a policeman to have them arrested. The defendant was the first one I found, and I told him how Lena was acting, and he said he would come and see about it. I went home, and he soon came down. Lena was on the inside of the house and the man on the outside, and they were cursing and abusing each other. The defendant arrested the man and told Lena to keep quiet or he would arrest her. He started off with the man and Lena kept cursing and swearing and using all sorts of vulgar language, and he came back to arrest her. When he went to the door she shut it, and defendant went to another door and she shut that, and he pushed or kicked it open and went in. I heard them scuffling in there anti heard blows, but could not hear what was said or see what was done."

D. J Smith testified: "I heard a disturbance at Lena Walton's and went over there. Defendant called me and another man to assist him, and we went in and helped to arrest Lena. She held back and would not go, and we three had all we could do to bring her out of the house. When I first saw her she was bleeding profusely about the head. She had a wound about the head and was very bloody. On the way to jail she began swearing and using profane language on the street and defendant put his hands to her throat and choked her to keep her from using such language. He choked her twice before reaching the jail. I did not see him strike her in the house. She was bleeding when I first saw her. She is a big, strong woman, and it took all three of us to get her to jail. In going to jail the other man and I had hold of her arms, and the defendant pushed from the rear. I don't know whether the defendant was mad or not, but he seemed to be. I got pretty mad."

The State then introduced J. D. Page to prove what Lena Walton testified before the police court. Defendant objected to the testimony on the ground that no foundation had been laid, and that the defendant was not a party to that suit. The court sustained the objection.

R. L Williams testified: "I am sheriff of Garland county. A subpoena was placed in my hands for Lena Walton, but after diligent search I was unable to find her, and returned the subpoena as not served. I am informed that she has left the State."

J. D Page was then re-called and testified: "Lena Walton swore in the police court that defendant came in her house and hit her over the head with a pistol; that she did not resist his attempt to arrest her until he struck her with his pistol. Her face was covered with dry, clotted blood at the time. She said she wanted the officers to see what had been done to her. The defendant was present when she testified and denied the truth of her statements. I do not know whether I have stated all that she testified to or not. I am an attorney-at-law, and she came to see me about being arrested."

The defendant testified: "I am a policeman of the city of Hot Springs, Arkansas. Some time about the first of March witness, Eliza Johnson, came to me and requested me to go down and stop a disturbance at Lena Walton's. I went down in a short while and found Lena and a white man, with whom she was living, in a row. She was on the inside of the house and he was on the outside, and they were cursing and abusing each other. I arrested the man and told Lena to keep quiet or I would have to arrest her. I started off with the man in charge and Lena kept cursing and using indecent language. I saw witness Crosby across the street, and called him over to assist me. I went back to the house to arrest Lena. I left the man in charge of Crosby and went to the back door and demanded admittance, but she would not let me in, and I went to the other door. She tried to close that, and I stuck my foot in to prevent her from closing it and forced it open and demanded her arrest. She grabbed an iron poker and tried to strike me with it, but I caught it and took it away from her. She then took a flatiron to strike me with, but I took that away from her. She then started to get a butcher knife which was lying on the table, and I struck her with my pistol and then grabbed her hands, and I struck her because I was afraid she would cut me with the knife if I did not. She is a large; powerful woman. I was unable to take her alone, and called in Mr. Smith and another man who had come up to the door to assist me. It was all we three could do to take her out of the house. She fought, kicked and pulled back. We had a great deal of trouble in taking her to the jail.

"The knife was lying on the table, and I was between her and the table--nearer to the table than she was. I struck her over the head with my pistol. On the way to the jail when she would swear and use obscene language I would shut off her wind. I shut off her wind twice by choking her. I did this to stop her from talking and cursing so. I do not remember saying, a short time after I was indicted, that I wished I had killed her; that I would have had less trouble over it but may have done so. I am sorry now I did not kill her.

"The knife was lying...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Board of Improvement v. School District
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • June 11, 1892
    ... ... 554; 71 N.Y. 498; 116 Mass. 193; 17 Wall. 329; 12 L. R. A ... 852. These cases show that public property of the United ... States, the State, county or the city are not subject to ... local assessments. See also 17 Wall. 329; 80 N.Y. 302, 306; ... 42 Pa. 21; 51 Ill. 39, 52; 44 Conn. 360; ... ...
  • Long v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • May 28, 1904
    ...156; 58 Ark. 277; 1 Greenleaf, Ev. § 375. Nor can it be proved by proof of association with felons. 58 Ark. 473; 46 Ark. 141; 66 Ark. 286; 56 Ark. 345; 25 Ark. 89; 69 Ark. 648; 69 Ark. 653. It was error to to permit appellant to introduce testimony as to the dangerous character of deceased.......
  • Burks v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • March 31, 1906
  • McCarley v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • October 14, 1974
    ...could properly be considered by the jury in mitigation of punishment if it gave credit to the defendant's statement. Stone v. State, 56 Ark. 345, 19 S.W. 968. We certainly are not prepared to say that the jury would not have assessed a lesser punishment, even on a verdict of second degree m......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT