Strahan v. The State

Decision Date02 March 1891
Citation68 Miss. 347,8 So. 844
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
PartiesW. S. STRAHAN v. THE STATE

October, 1890

FROM the circuit court of Covington county, HON. A. G. MAYERS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of carrying a concealed weapon contrary to § 2985, code 1880.

There is no conflict in the evidence. One Webster, who was sheriff of Covington county, gave his pistol to appellant for the purpose of having it repaired. Appellant was accustomed to do such jobs, and after receiving the pistol carried it to his home some two or three miles distant, and afterwards, at Webster's request, brought it back. While on his way, he carried the pistol in his pocket for the sake of convenience.

The court refused an instruction asked by appellant that the jury should acquit under the foregoing facts.

Affirmed.

J. F. N. Huddleston and Robert Lowry, for appellant.

There was an absence of criminal intent, and the case does not come within the evils intended to be prohibited by the legislature.

T. M. Miller, attorney-general, for the state.

The case is clearly within the letter of the statute. Walls v. State, 7 Blackf. 572.

Defendant's motive or intention constituted no part of the offense. It had nothing to do with the guilt or innocence of the fact charged.

OPINION

COOPER, J.

The court properly refused the instruction asked by the appellant, and the verdict of guilty is sustained by the evidence.

The defendant did the act forbidden by the statute, which makes the prohibited fact and not the intent criminal. Bishop on Statutory Crimes, § 789; State v. Speller, 86 N.C. 697; Preston v. The State, 63 Ala. 127; Titus v. The State, 42 Tex. 578; Carroll v. The State, 28 Ark. 99; Walls v. The State, 7 Blackf. 572.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Ward v. Colom
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • June 7, 2018
    ...appropriate even when a person lacked criminal intent, and even when he carried the concealed weapon in his own home. Strahan v. State , 68 Miss. 347, 8 So. 844 (1891) ; Wilson v. State , 81 Miss. 404, 33 So. 171 (1903).¶ 49. "[I]t is necessary to construe all the provisions of the Constitu......
  • Anderson v. State
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • September 1, 1991
    ...occasion therefor, under the evidence in the case."3 Hochheimer cites State v. Dixon, 114 N.C. 850, 19 S.E. 364 (1894); Strahan v. State, 68 Miss. 347, 8 So. 844 (1891); Goldsmith v. State, 99 Ga. 253, 25 S.E. 624 (1896); Walls v. State, 7 Blackf. 572 (Ind.1845); Cutsinger v. Commonwealth, ......
  • Russell v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • February 11, 1899
    ...846; 29 Hun, 628; 58 Ia. 165; 1 McClain, Cr. Law, § 128; 6 Cow. 512; 7 Blackf. 572; 63 Mo. 570; 5 McLean, 242; 34 W.Va. 88; 16 R. I. 403; 68 Miss. 347; 163 Mass. 103; 36 38; 70 Mo. 635; 40 Ark. 480; 13 Bush (Ky.), 318; 11 L. R. A. 530; 139 Pa. 247; L. R. 2 C. C. 154; 44 Ia. 45; 2 Met. 190. ......
  • People v. Smith, Docket No. 7608
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • February 6, 1970
    ...7 Blackf. (Ind.) 572; Ridenour v. State (1879), 65 Ind. 411; Cutsinger v. Commonwealth (1890), (70 Ky.) 7 Bush 392; Strahan v. State (1890), 68 Miss. 347, 8 So. 844.' Later the Court commented that 'We agree with counsel that concealment implies an assent of mind and purpose, but the word i......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT