Sturman v. Socha

Decision Date09 August 1983
Citation191 Conn. 1,463 A.2d 527
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
PartiesMuriel STURMAN v. Edward SOCHA et al.
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
134 cases
  • Borelli v. Renaldi
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • June 24, 2020
    ...Conn. 571, 588–89, 153 A.3d 588 (2017) ("[i]ndeed, the failure to exercise discretion is an abuse in and of itself"); Sturman v. Socha , 191 Conn. 1, 7, 463 A.2d 527 (1983) ("[D]iscretion imports something more than leeway in [decision making]. ... Judicial discretion ... is always legal di......
  • Gaudio v. Gaudio
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • September 18, 1990
    ...the controversy in such condition that its final disposition may be inconsistent with equity and good conscience. Sturman v. Socha, 191 Conn. 1, 6, 463 A.2d 527 (1983); Standard Mattress Co. v. Hartford, 31 Conn.Sup. 279, 288, 329 A.2d 613 (1974). Eannelli contends that Masterson is an indi......
  • Stamford Ridgeway Associates v. Board of Representatives of City of Stamford
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • April 3, 1990
    ...3A Moore, Federal Practice § 19.07.' Standard Mattress Co. v. Hartford, 31 Conn.Sup. 279, 288, 329 A.2d 613 (1974)." Sturman v. Socha, 191 Conn. 1, 6, 463 A.2d 527 (1983). In addition, we have held that " '[a]n applicant who received a favorable decision from the zoning board of appeals is ......
  • Fellows v. Martin, 14055
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • January 1, 1991
    ...rental payment of $9900. Although we ordinarily are reluctant to interfere with a trial court's equitable discretion; Sturman v. Socha, 191 Conn. 1, 7, 463 A.2d 527 (1983); see also Natural Harmony, Inc. v. Normand, supra, 211 Conn. at 149-50, 558 A.2d 231; we will reverse where we find tha......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Normative Legal Theories: The Case for Pluralism and Balancing
    • United States
    • Iowa Law Review No. 98-2, January 2013
    • January 1, 2013
    ...rule. See Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. v. G.W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co., 442 P.2d 641, 645–46 nn.7–8 (Cal. 1968). 28. E.g. , Sturman v. Socha, 463 A.2d 527, 532 (Conn. 1983). 29. E.g. , Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. , 442 P.2d at 644–45 (“A word has no meaning apart from these factors; much less does it......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT