Sussman v. Tutelman, 83-1424

Decision Date21 February 1984
Docket NumberNo. 83-1424,83-1424
PartiesJoel SUSSMAN, d/b/a Surrey Management Company; Business Property Progress, Inc., d/b/a Surrey Hotel; and Kent Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Mary TUTELMAN, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder & Carson and Kathleen M. O'Connor, Miami, for appellants.

Robert A. Glassman, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellants, the defendants below in a personal injury lawsuit, seek reversal of an adverse final judgment. For the reasons which follow, we reverse and remand for the entry of a directed verdict in favor of the defendants.

Mary Tutelman had lived at the Surrey Hotel and walked in and out of the lobby three times daily for about one and one-half years. Upon entering the lobby one day she walked down a three to six foot wide "aisle" formed by a row of chairs facing a ten to twelve foot long yellow sofa. Both the sofa and the chairs were occupied. As Tutelman walked down the "aisle" she, by her own testimony, saw and then tripped over a cane held by a person sitting either upon the sofa or in one of the chairs and sustained injuries. She brought suit against the owner, lessor and insurer of the hotel property. The defendants moved for a directed verdict, which was denied. The jury found the defendants forty per cent negligent.

The evidence offered fails to demonstrate the presence of any legal duty, breach or causation linking the defendants to Tutelman's injuries. See Heps v. Burdines, Inc., 69 So.2d 340 (Fla.1954); Kraver v. Edelson, 55 So.2d 179 (Fla.1951); Cassel v. Price, 396 So.2d 258 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied mem., 407 So.2d 1102 (Fla.1981).

Reversed and remanded with directions.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Croon v. Quayside Associates, Ltd., s. 84-362
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 5 Febrero 1985
    ...in question happened on a site with which they were not involved. Heps v. Burdine's, Inc., 69 So.2d 340 (Fla.1954); Sussman v. Tutelman, 445 So.2d 1081 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). As to Quayside Associates we hold that a directed verdict should have been granted to them as a successor in interest t......
  • Sell v. Torres, 84-1110
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 5 Febrero 1985
    ...Sales-Rental Leasing Co. v. Nearhoof, 263 So.2d 569 (Fla.1972); Heps v. Burdine's, Inc., 69 So.2d 340 (Fla.1954); Sussman v. Tutelman, 445 So.2d 1081 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Fenner v. McLowhorn, 424 So.2d 50 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Schreier v. Parker, 415 So.2d 794 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Quinn v. Mill......
  • Tutelman v. Sussman
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 10 Julio 1984
    ...45 453 So.2d 45 Tutelman (Mary) v. Sussman (Joel) NO. 65,141 Supreme Court of Florida. JUL 10, 1984 Appeal From: 3d DCA 445 So.2d 1081 Pet. for rev. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT