Szapor v. City of Cape Canaveral, 5D00-1181.
| Decision Date | 26 January 2001 |
| Docket Number | No. 5D00-1181.,5D00-1181. |
| Citation | 775 So.2d 1016 |
| Parties | Ernest F. SZAPOR, Appellant, v. CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, etc., Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Albert S. Lagano, Melbourne, for Appellant.
Michael J. Roper, Ernest H. Kohlmyer, III, of Bell, Leeper & Roper, P.A., for Appellee.
We affirm the summary judgment determining that the appellant is barred from bringing an action in inverse condemnation because the applicable four year statute of limitations has expired. The appellant filed his action in 1996, but knew of the appellee's invasion of his legal rights in 1989 or 1990. See Fla.Stat. § 95.111(3)(p) (1996); Sarasota Welfare Home, Inc. v. City of Sarasota, 666 So.2d 171 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).
AFFIRMED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
New Testament Baptist Church v. Dot
...v. Ex, 645 So.2d 7 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); see also Suarez v. City of Tampa, 987 So.2d 681 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); Szapor v. City of Cape Canaveral, 775 So.2d 1016 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (citing Sarasota Welfare Home, Inc. v. City Sarasota, 666 So.2d 171 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)). Although Heckman and Ex do......
-
Suarez v. City of Tampa
...So.2d 171 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Hillsborough County Aviation Auth. v. Benitez, 200 So.2d 194 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967); Szapor v. City of Cape Canaveral, 775 So.2d 1016 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). The appellants' reliance on Dickinson is misplaced. In Dickinson, 331 U.S. at 749, 67 S.Ct. 1382 the Supreme C......
- Pittman v. State, 5D00-3018.