Tacoma Public Library v. Woessner
| Decision Date | 02 December 1998 |
| Docket Number | No. 66996-1,66996-1 |
| Citation | 136 Wn.2d 1030,972 P.2d 101 |
| Court | Washington Supreme Court |
| Parties | TACOMA PUBLIC LIBRARY, a municipal corporation, Respondent, v. Carolyn WOESSNER, individually, Petitioner. |
Prior report: 90 Wash.App. 205, 951 P.2d 357.
ORDER
All five members of Department II of the Court considered the matters set on its December 1, 1998, Motion Calendar, and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.Therefore, Chief Justice Barbara Durham directed that this order be entered:
IT IS ORDERED:
That the Petition for Review is granted.The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration in light of Progressive Animal Welfare Society v. University of Washington, 114 Wash.2d 677, 790 P.2d 604(1990);Dawson v. Daly, 120 Wash.2d 782, 845 P.2d 995(1993);andLimstrom v. Ladenburg, 136 Wash.2d 595, 963 P.2d 869(1998).
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 cases
-
Brown v. State, Dept. of Health, Dental Disciplinary Bd.
... ... The intent of the Legislature in creating the Act is to "assure the public of the adequacy of professional competence and conduct in the healing ... ...
-
Wood v. Lowe
... ... for attorney fees, costs and sanctions for the denial of an alleged public records request under the Public Disclosure Act, RCW 42.17(PDA). The trial ... entire case.'" PAWS I, 114 Wash.2d at 684, 790 P.2d 604 (quoting Tacoma News, Inc. v. Tacoma-Pierce Cy. Health Dep't, 55 Wash. App. 515, 525, 778 ... , 120 Wash.2d 782, 845 P.2d 995 (1993) (prosecutor); Tacoma Public Library v. Woessner, 90 Wash.App. 205, 951 P.2d 357, remanded on other grounds, ... ...
4 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...9.1(1), 9.1(3), 9.2(2), 16.3(8) Tacoma Pub. Library v. Woessner, 90 Wn.App. 205, 951 P.2d 357, review granted and remanded, 136 Wn.2d 1030 (1998), and amended on remand, 972 P.2d 932 (1999): 8.3(1)(d), 10.2(3), 10.2(3)(a), 10.2(3)(b)(i), 16.3(8), 18.4(2)(a), 20.2(1) Telford v. Thurston Cnty......
-
§18.4 Attorney Fees
...II), 136 Wn.2d 595, 963 P.2d 869 (1998), and perhaps come up with a different conclusion. Tacoma Pub. Library v. Woessner (Woessner II), 136 Wn.2d 1030, 972 P.2d 101 (1998). On remand, the Court of Appeals deleted the portion of the opinion denying the requestor attorney fees and inserted t......
-
§10.2 Relevant Exemptions
...to fall under RCW 42.56.230(3). See Tacoma Pub. Library v. Woessner, 90 Wn.App. 205, 216-17, 951 P.2d 357, review granted and remanded, 136 Wn.2d 1030 (1998), and amended on remand, 972 P.2d 932 (1999) (agency-wide report on employees' benefits, which were not contained in any single employ......
-
§8.3 The Definition of Privacy-The Evolution of the Doctrine
...Police Guild v. City of Puyallup Citing Tacoma Public Library v. Woessner, 90 Wn.App. 205, 951 P.2d 357, review granted and remanded, 136 Wn.2d 1030 (1998), and amended on remand, 972 P.2d 932 (1999), litigants sometimes argue that information should be exempt from disclosure not because th......