Tandon v. Newsom
Decision Date | 09 April 2021 |
Docket Number | No. 20A151,20A151 |
Parties | Ritesh TANDON, et al. v. Gavin NEWSOM, Governor of California, et al. |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
The application for injunctive relief presented to Justice KAGAN and by her referred to the Court is granted pending disposition of the appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, if such writ is timely sought. Should the petition for a writ of certiorari be denied, this order shall terminate automatically. In the event the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the order shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this Court.
* * *
The Ninth Circuit's failure to grant an injunction pending appeal was erroneous. This Court's decisions have made the following points clear.
First, government regulations are not neutral and generally applicable, and therefore trigger strict scrutiny under the Free Exercise Clause, whenever they treat any comparable secular activity more favorably than religious exercise. Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo , 592 U. S. ––––, –––– – ––––, 141 S.Ct. 63, 67-68, 208 L.Ed.2d 206 (2020) (per curiam ). It is no answer that a State treats some comparable secular businesses or other activities as poorly as or even less favorably than the religious exercise at issue. Id. , at –––– – ––––, 141 S.Ct., at 66-67 (KAVANAUGH, J., concurring)
Second, whether two activities are comparable for purposes of the Free Exercise Clause must be judged against the asserted government interest that justifies the regulation at issue. Id. , at ––––, 141 S.Ct., 67 (per curiam ) ( ). Comparability is concerned with the risks various activities pose, not the reasons why people gather. Id. , at ––––, 141 S.Ct., at 66 (GORSUCH, J., concurring)
Third, the government has the burden to establish that the challenged law satisfies strict scrutiny. To do so in this context, it must do more than assert that certain risk factors "are always present in worship, or always absent from the other secular activities" the government may allow. South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. Newsom , 592 U. S. ––––, ––––, 141 S.Ct. 716, 718, ––– L.Ed.2d –––– (2021) (statement of GORSUCH, J.); id. , at ––––, 141 S.Ct., at 717 (BARRETT, J., concurring). Instead, narrow tailoring requires the government to show that measures less restrictive of the First Amendment activity could not address its interest in reducing the spread of COVID. Where the government permits other activities to proceed with precautions, it must show that the religious exercise at issue is more dangerous than those activities even when the same precautions are applied. Otherwise, precautions that suffice for other activities suffice for religious exercise too. Roman Catholic Diocese , 592 U. S., at –––– – ––––, 141 S.Ct., at 69-70; South Bay , 592 U. S., at ––––, 141 S.Ct., at 719 (statement of GORSUCH, J.)
Fourth, even if the government withdraws or modifies a COVID restriction in the course of litigation, that does not necessarily moot the case. And so long as a case is not moot, litigants otherwise entitled to emergency injunctive relief remain entitled to such relief where the applicants "remain under a constant threat" that government officials will use their power to reinstate the challenged restrictions. Roman Catholic Diocese , 592 U. S., at ––––, 141 S.Ct., at 68 ; see also High Plains Harvest Church v. Polis , 592 U. S. ––––, 141 S.Ct. 527, 208 L.Ed.2d 503 (2020).
These principles dictated the outcome in this case, as they did in Gateway City Church v. Newsom , 592 U. S. ––––, ––– S.Ct. ––––, ––– L.Ed.2d ––––, 2021 WL 308606 (2021). First, California treats some comparable secular activities more favorably than at-home religious exercise, permitting hair salons, retail stores, personal care services, movie theaters, private suites at sporting events and concerts, and indoor restaurants to bring together more than three households at a time. App. to Emergency Application for Writ of Injunction 183–189. Second, the Ninth Circuit did not conclude that those activities pose a lesser risk of transmission than applicants’ proposed religious exercise at home. The Ninth Circuit erroneously rejected these comparators simply because this Court's previous decisions involved public buildings as opposed to private buildings. Tandon v. Newsom , 992 F. 3d 916, 919–20, 922–24, (C.A.9 2021). Third, instead of requiring the State to explain why it could not safely permit at-home worshipers to gather in larger numbers while using precautions used in secular activities, the Ninth Circuit erroneously declared that such measures might not "translate readily" to the home. Id. , at 926–27. The State cannot "assume the worst when people go to worship but assume the best when people go to work." Roberts v. Neace , 958 F.3d 409, 414 (C.A.6 2020) (per curiam ). And fourth, although California officials changed the challenged policy shortly after this application was filed, the previous restrictions remain in place until April 15th, and officials with a track record of "moving the goalposts" retain authority to reinstate those heightened restrictions at any time. South Bay , 592 U. S., at ––––, 141 S.Ct., at 720 (statement of GORSUCH, J.).
Applicants are likely to succeed on the merits of their free exercise claim; they are irreparably harmed by the loss of free exercise rights "for even minimal periods of time"; and the State has not shown that "public health would be imperiled" by employing less restrictive measures. Roman Catholic Diocese , 592 U. S., at ––––, 141 S.Ct., at 68. Accordingly, applicants are entitled to an injunction pending appeal.
This is the fifth time the Court has summarily rejected the Ninth Circuit's analysis of California's COVID restrictions on religious exercise. See Harvest Rock Church v. Newsom , 592 U. S. ––––, 141 S.Ct. 889, 208 L.Ed.2d 448 (2020) ; South Bay , 592 U. S. ––––, 141 S.Ct. 716 ; Gish v. Newsom , 592 U. S. ––––, 141 S.Ct. 1290, ––– L.Ed.2d –––– (2021) ; Gateway City , 592 U. S. ––––, ––– S.Ct. ––––. It is unsurprising that such litigants are entitled to relief. California's Blueprint System contains myriad exceptions and accommodations for comparable activities, thus requiring the application of strict scrutiny. And historically, strict scrutiny requires the State to further "interests of the highest order" by means "narrowly tailored in pursuit of those interests." Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. Hialeah , 508 U.S. 520, 546, 113 S.Ct. 2217, 124...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Chung v. Wash. Interscholastic Activities Ass'n
...scheduling decision at issue here. See Dkt. #86 (citing the Supreme Court's recent per curiam decision in Tandon v. Newsom , 593 U.S. ––––, 141 S.Ct. 1294, 209 L.Ed.2d 355 (2021) ). Tandon reversed the Ninth Circuit's denial of plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction on a California l......
-
Calm Ventures LLC v. Newsom
...See Tandon v. Newsom , 992 F.3d 916, 930 (9th Cir. 2021), disapproved in later proceedings on other grounds , ––– U.S. ––––, 141 S.Ct. 1294, 209 L.Ed.2d 355 (2021) ("We have ‘never held that the right to pursue work is a fundamental right,’ and, as such, the district court likely did not er......
-
Pirtle v. Legislative Council Comm. of the N.M.
...restrictions on attendance at religious activities without discussing or citing Jacobson ), and Tandon v. Newsom , ––– U.S. ––––, 141 S. Ct. 1294, 209 L.Ed.2d 355 (2021) (per curiam ) (same).{38} Against this backdrop and with these considerations in mind, we now consider in turn the consti......
-
Right to Life of Cent. Cal. v. Bonta
...expressive activity) and its exemption for labor picketing (a secular activity). See Tandon v. Newsom , ––– U.S. ––––, 141 S. Ct. 1294, 1296, 209 L.Ed.2d 355 (2021) (citing Roman Cath. Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo , ––– U.S. ––––, 141 S. Ct. 63, 67–68, 208 L.Ed.2d 206 (2020) ) ("[G]overnmen......
-
THE "ESSENTIAL" FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE.
...(2021) (mem.). (545.) 141 S. Ct. 972 (2021) (mem.). (546.) 141 S. Ct. 547 (2021) (mem.). (547.) 141 S. Ct. 1460 (2021) (mem.). (548.) 141 S. Ct. 1294 (549.) Id. at 1296-98. (550.) See John Blackman, Breaking: California Lifts All "Location" and Capacity Limits on Places of Worship, REASON: ......
-
Governmental tort liability
...relief to plaintiffs, finding they were likely to prevail in their claim for violation of Free Exercise Clause. Tandon v. Newsom (2021) 141 S. Ct. 1294. §1:12 Claims Against an Employee of a Public Entity Employees of a public entity are liable for their tortious conduct except where prohib......
-
KEEPING OUR BALANCE: WHY THE FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE NEEDS TEXT, HISTORY, AND TRADITION.
...v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. 682, 713-717 (2014). (7.) Zubik v. Burwell, 578 U.S. 403, 407-08 (2016). (8.) Tandon v. Newsom, 141 S. Ct. 1294, 1296 (9.) Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & Sch. v. EEOC, 565 U.S. 171, 188-92 (2012). (10.) Our Lady of Guadalupe Sch. v. Mor......
-
THE LIMITS OF CHURCH AUTONOMY.
...Bilbrey v. Myers, 91 So. 3d 887, 891 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012). (140) See Idleman, supra note 8, at 262. (141) See Tandon v. Newsom, 141 S. Ct. 1294 (2021); Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, 141 S. Ct. 1868 (2021); see also Lael Weinberger, Religious Liberty, Exceptions, and Targeting, NAT'L......