Taylor v. Powell

Decision Date22 April 1981
Docket NumberNo. 61651,61651
Citation280 S.E.2d 386,158 Ga.App. 339
PartiesTAYLOR et al. v. POWELL et al.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Gould B. Hagler, Duncan D. Wheale, Augusta, for appellants.

George W. Fryhofer, Preston B. Lewis, Jr., Waynesboro, for appellees.

SHULMAN, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs bring this appeal, alleging that the trial court, in violation of Code Ann. § 81-1004, permitted more than one counsel to speak on behalf of the defendants in closing argument.

The evidence shows that counsel for the plaintiffs made the concluding argument. No violation of Code Ann. § 81-1004 thus appears. See Duke v. Steed, 127 Ga.App. 541, 194 S.E.2d 257.

Judgment affirmed.

BIRDSONG and SOGNIER, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Sheriff v. State, S03G0492.
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • October 6, 2003
    ...that the statute was not violated when two attorneys argued on behalf of the party with the middle argument. In Taylor v. Powell, 158 Ga.App. 339, 280 S.E.2d 386 (1981), the Court of Appeals observed that "[t]he evidence shows that counsel for the plaintiffs made the concluding argument. No......
  • Goforth v. Wigley
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 21, 1986
    ...v. Cline, 174 Ga.App. 448, 449, 330 S.E.2d 386; Heard, Leverette & Adams P.C. v. Stone, 167 Ga.App. 113, 306 S.E.2d 72; Taylor v. Powell, 158 Ga.App. 339, 280 S.E.2d 386; Bennett v. Haley, 132 Ga.App. 512, 518, 208 S.E.2d 302), we find only two cases that indicate what is meant by the statu......
  • Steverson v. Eason, A89A2133
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • January 19, 1990
    ...usual, plaintiff's counsel had the concluding argument. There was no error in the court's handling of this matter. Taylor v. Powell, 158 Ga.App. 339, 280 S.E.2d 386 (1981); Duke v. Steed, 127 Ga.App. 541, 194 S.E.2d 257 3. The trial court did not err in failing to give Steverson's request t......
  • Williams v. Greenfield Equipment Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 8, 1987
    ...argument; the two defense attorneys then argued; and the plaintiff's second attorney concluded the argument. Under Taylor v. Powell, 158 Ga.App. 339, 280 S.E.2d 386 (1981), this procedure did not violate OCGA § Judgment affirmed. BIRDSONG, C.J., and POPE, J., concur. ...
1 books & journal articles
  • Criminal Law - Laura D. Hogue and Franklin J. Hogue
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 56-1, September 2004
    • Invalid date
    ...v. Eason, 194 Ga. App. 273, 390 S.E.2d 424 (1990); Goforth v. Wigley, 178 Ga. App. 558, 343 S.E.2d 788 (1986); Taylor v. Powell, 158 Ga. App. 339, 280 S.E.2d 386 (1981); Limbrick v. State, 152 Ga. App. 615, 263 S.E.2d 502 (1979). 309. Bentley v. B.M.W., Inc., 209 Ga. App. 526, 433 S.E.2d 71......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT