Taylor v. State Tax Commission

Decision Date17 December 1981
PartiesIn the Matter of John A. TAYLOR et al., Petitioners, v. STATE TAX COMMISSION of the State of New York, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Kelley, Drye & Warren, New York City (John A. Garraty, Jr., New York City, of counsel) for petitioners.

Robert Abrams, Atty. Gen. (Lawrence J. Logan, Asst. Atty. Gen., of counsel) for respondent.

Before MAHONEY, P. J., and SWEENEY, KANE, CASEY and WEISS, JJ.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the State Tax Commission which sustained a resident trust income tax deficiency imposed pursuant to article 22 of the Tax Law.

William H. Taylor died a resident of New York State on August 26, 1950. By will, he placed the assets of his residuary estate in trust, naming his two sons and a predecessor corporation of Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, as trustees. The trustees were given the power to hold, manage, control invest and sell any of the testator's property for the benefit of the income beneficiaries.

Included in the assets of the residuary estate was real property located in the State of Florida. Under Florida law, the trustee bank, a New York corporation, was prohibited from acting as trustee over Florida real property. Petitioners John A. Taylor and Robert H. Taylor, therefore, were appointed by the County Judge's Court of Dade County, Florida as the sole trustees of the Florida property.

During 1970, 1971 and 1975, certain parcels of the Florida property were sold. Payments for the property were received by petitioners John A. Taylor and Robert H. Taylor, as trustees, and placed in a separate account maintained at the Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company in New York "in an agency relationship." The proceeds were not placed in the trust account.

New York income tax fiduciary returns for the years 1970, 1971 and 1975, on which the capital gain income derived from the sale of the Florida real property was subtracted from Federal taxable income as a New York modification, were filed. Subsequently, in 1977, the Income Tax Bureau issued notices of deficiency for the years in question based on the disallowance of the modifications pertaining to the capital gain income from the sale of the Florida property. Following a hearing, respondent affirmed the deficiencies assessed against the trust. This proceeding ensued.

Sections 601, 605 and 618 of the Tax Law impose an income tax on all resident trusts, including testamentary trusts created by individuals who were New York domiciliaries at the time of their death. However, under the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Chase Manhattan Bank v. Gavin, (SC 15875)
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • 1 Junio 1999
    ...of Revenue, 727 S.W.2d 880 (Mo. 1987); Pennoyer v. Taxation Division Director, 5 N.J. Tax 386 (1983); Taylor v. State Tax Commission, 85 App. Div. 2d 821, 445 N.Y.S.2d 648 (1981). We also disagree with the plaintiff's contention that, because Quill Corp. involved the collection and payment ......
  • Chase Manhattan Bank v. Commissioner of Revenue Services
    • United States
    • Connecticut Superior Court
    • 5 Diciembre 1997
    ...v. Kimball, 91 Me. 605, 40 A. 666 (1898); Pennoyer v. Taxation Division Director, 5 N.J.Tax 386 (1983); Taylor v. State Tax Commission, 85 App.Div.2d 821, 445 N.Y.S.2d 648 (1981); First National Bank of Boston v. Harvey, 111 Vt. 281, 16 A.2d 184 (1940); Bayfield County v. Pishon, 162 Wis. 4......
  • Fielding v. Comm'r of Revenue
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • 18 Julio 2018
    ...intangible assets of the trust, which was domiciled in Maryland, could not impose a tax on those assets); Taylor v. State Tax Comm’n , 85 A.D.2d 821, 445 N.Y.S.2d 648, 649 (1981) (holding that New York could not impose an income tax on trust property because "possession and control" of thos......
  • Westfall v. Director of Revenue
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 23 Julio 1991
    ...359 Mo. 812, 224 S.W.2d 90, 95 (1949); McDaniel Title Co. v. Lemons, 626 S.W.2d 686, 690 (Mo.App.1981).3 See Taylor v. State Tax Comm'n, 85 A.D.2d 821, 445 N.Y.S.2d 648, 649 (1981), holding that the concept of "resident trust" must be applied in a way consistent with due ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • California Income Tax Issues for Non-california Trusts - Part 2
    • United States
    • California Lawyers Association California Trusts & Estates Quarterly (CLA) No. 20-2, January 2014
    • Invalid date
    ...have no present right, is in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.").43. See, e.g., Taylor v. State Tax Commissioner (3d Dept. 1981) 445 N.Y.S.2d 648; Pennoyer v. Taxation Div. Dir. (N.J. Tax Ct. 1983) 5 N.J. Tax 386; Potter v. Taxation Div. Dir. (N.J. Tax Ct. 1983) 5 N.J. Tax 399; In re S......
  • Income Taxation of Estates and Trusts
    • United States
    • Connecticut Bar Association Connecticut Bar Journal No. 65, 1990
    • Invalid date
    ...from sources outside of New York State, determined as if the trust were a nonresident. See In re John A. Taylor v. State Tax Commission, 85 A.D.2d 821, 445 N.Y.S.2d 648 (3rd Dept. (Settlor's New York domicile at death insufficient basis for New York's imposition of capital gains tax on trus......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT