Templeton v. Ferguson
Decision Date | 16 December 1895 |
Citation | 33 S.W. 329 |
Parties | TEMPLETON et al. v. FERGUSON et al. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Trespass to try title by Frank Templeton and others against Catherine Ferguson and others. From a judgment of the court of civil appeals (32 S. W. 148) reversing a judgment for plaintiffs, plaintiffs bring error. Affirmed.
Rector, Thomson & Rector, for plaintiffs in error. Thomas M. Joseph, for defendants in error.
The evidence in the record shows:
(1) That James B. Murphy came from Georgia to Texas as a soldier under Fannin; that he was a member of Capt. Wadsworth's company, and was killed at Goliad, while carrying a dispatch from Ward to Fannin, a few days before the Fannin massacre in 1836; that he "never located or lived in Texas only in the service under Fannin."
(2) That during the July term, 1837, of the probate court of Harrisburg county, republic of Texas, Wynns & Lawrence, composed of Archibald Wynns and William Lawrence, representing themselves to be attorneys in fact of William Bressie, filed a petition in said court representing "that James G. Aldridge, Thomas Rogers, and James B. Murphy, who departed this life some time in the year 1836, intestate, were soldiers in the service of the republic aforesaid, previous to the organization of said republic into counties; that said Bressie has purchased the claims of the persons aforesaid from their legal representatives in the United States, and has power from said persons to settle said claims in such manner as they themselves might have done could they have been present; which said powers of attorney, with a power of attorney from the said Bressie, are now in the possession of your petitioners, authorizing and empowering them to administer upon the estates of the persons aforesaid"; and praying that they be appointed to administer said estates in accordance with law.
(3) That at the same term said court entered the following order:
(4) That in pursuance of said order said administrators entered into a bond of a thousand dollars in each of said cases, which was duly approved by the court.
(5) That the records of the land office show that the following certificates had been issued at the respective dates shown thereon:
(6) That after the issuance of these certificates said administrators, on the 26th day of March, 1838, filed in said court a paper in the following words, namely:
(7) That thereafter the court in said administration made the following orders:
(8) That thereafter, on the 4th day of December, 1840, said administrators in said estate filed the following paper:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cleveland v. Ward
...the court into execution. Banton v. Wilson, 4 Tex. 400, 402; Withers v. Patterson, 27 Tex. 491, 496, 86 Am. Dec. 643; Templeton v. Ferguson, 89 Tex. 47, 54, 33 S. W. 329; G., T. & W. Ry. Co. v. Lunn (Tex. Civ. App.) 141 S. W. 538, 541; Corpus Juris, vol. 15, pp. 723 to 726; Swift & Co. v. M......
-
Bandy v. First State Bank, Overton, Tex.
...in a collateral attack unless the challenge asserts that the court had no possible power to grant the order. Templeton v. Ferguson, 89 Tex. 47, 33 S.W. 329, 332, 333 (1895). In this case, Bandy does not challenge the County Court's power over Walton's estate and property and over the subjec......
-
In the Matter of The Marriage of J.B. And H.B. In Re State
...court 'has not, under the very law of its creation, any possible power' to decide the case." Id. at *2 (quoting Templeton v. Ferguson, 89 Tex. 47, 54, 33 S.W. 329, 332 (Tex.1895)). "A Texas court has no more power to issue a divorce decree for a same-sex marriage than it does to administer ......
-
Ex parte Cannon
...of the court into execution. Banton v. Wilson, 4 Tex. 400, 402; Withers v. Patterson, 27 Tex. 491, 496, 86 Am.Dec. 643; Templeton v. Ferguson, 89 Tex. 47, 54, 33 S.W. 329: G.T. & W. Ry. Co. v. Lunn (Tex.Civ.App.), 141 S.W. 538, 541; Corpus Juris vol. 15, pp. 723 to 726; Swift & Co. v. Memph......