Tepedino v. Zurich-American Ins. Group
| Decision Date | 16 October 1995 |
| Docket Number | ZURICH-AMERICAN |
| Parties | Anthony TEPEDINO, et al., Respondents, v.INSURANCE GROUP, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Morris, Duffy, Alonso & Marulli, New York City (Virginia Curry and Irwin H. Haut, of counsel), for appellant.
Ralph P. Casella, P.C., Staten Island (Edwin G. Bergmann, of counsel), for respondents.
Before SULLIVAN, J.P., and THOMPSON, COPERTINO, KRAUSMAN and FLORIO, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In an action for a judgment declaring, inter alia, that the defendant is obligated to defend and indemnify its insured, Allied Woodbrook, Inc., with respect to an underlying action brought by the plaintiffs against Allied Woodbrook, Inc., the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Leone, J.), dated May 4, 1994, as denied its cross motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
This action seeks a judgment declaring, inter alia, that the defendant is required to defend and indemnify its insured, Allied Woodbrook, Inc. (hereinafter Allied), with respect to an underlying action brought by the plaintiffs against Allied to recover damages allegedly caused by Allied in its construction of their home. The defendant disclaimed coverage of the claims in the underlying action.
We reject the defendant's contention that the instant action is premature as the underlying action has not been resolved. A party who is not privy to an insurance contract but would nevertheless benefit from the insurance policy may bring a declaratory judgment action to determine whether the insurer owes a defense and/or coverage under the policy (see, Costa v. Colonial Penn Ins. Co., 204 A.D.2d 591, 612 N.Y.S.2d 617; Reliance Ins. Co. v. Garsart Bldg. Corp., 122 A.D.2d 128, 505 N.Y.S.2d 160; see also, Town of Islip v. Zara & Sons Contr. Co., 207 A.D.2d 339, 615 N.Y.S.2d 428). Moreover, a declaratory judgment action against insurers with respect to jural relations, either as to present or prospective obligations, is permitted prior to entry of judgment in the underlying action (see, Costa v. Colonial Penn Ins. Co., supra; cf., Hesse v. Speece, 204 A.D.2d 514, 611 N.Y.S.2d 308).
The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Nap, Inc. v. Shuttletex, Inc., 98 Civ. 7776(VM).
...See, e.g., Halali v. Evanston Ins. Co., 245 A.D.2d 422, 666 N.Y.S.2d 676 (2d Dep't 1997); Tepedino v. Zurich-American Ins. Group, 220 A.D.2d 579, 580, 632 N.Y.S.2d 604, 605 (2d Dep't 1995). In these cases, the Appellate Division specifically held that a declaratory judgment action by an inj......
-
Richards v. Select Ins. Co., Inc.
...against the insured, was allowed to sue the insurer in a declaratory judgment action. See Tepedino v. Zurich-American Ins. Group, 220 A.D.2d 579, 580, 632 N.Y.S.2d 604, 605 (2d Dep't 1995); Costa v. Colonial Penn Ins. Co., 204 A.D.2d 591, 612 N.Y.S.2d 617 (2d Dep't 1994); cf. Abate v. All-C......
-
Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Mitlof, 99 CIV. 9841(WCC).
...that a disclaiming insurance company owes a duty to defend or indemnify the tortfeasor."); Tepedino v. Zurich-American Ins. Group, 220 A.D.2d 579, 632 N.Y.S.2d 604, 605 (2d Dep't 1995) ("A party who is not privy to an insurance contract but would nevertheless benefit from the ... policy may......
-
Watson v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.
...between our decisions in Latoni v. Mount Vernon Fire Ins. Co., 219 A.D.2d 698, 631 N.Y.S.2d 756, and Tepedino v. Zurich-American Ins. Group, 220 A.D.2d 579, 632 N.Y.S.2d 604. The plaintiff, Christopher K. Watson, was allegedly injured on November 3, 1992, in a fall at the premises of John M......