Territory of Arizona v. West
Decision Date | 26 January 1894 |
Docket Number | Criminal 80 |
Citation | 36 P. 207,4 Ariz. 212 |
Parties | TERRITORY OF ARIZONA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DANIEL WEST, Defendant and Appellant |
Court | Arizona Supreme Court |
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District in and for the County of Yavapai. John J. Hawkins Judge.
J. F Wilson, for Appellant.
Francis J. Heney, Attorney-General, and J. C. Herndon, District Attorney, for Respondent.
OPINION
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Appellant was indicted and tried for the crime of "an assault to commit murder," and a verdict was returned finding him guilty of "an assault with a deadly weapon." Judgment was pronounced against appellant, on said verdict, that he be imprisoned in the territorial prison; and he appealed, and urges as ground of error that the crime of which he was found guilty is not charged in the indictment against him, and for errors of the trial court in giving a certain instruction, and also in failing to give an instruction defining a "deadly weapon."
The indictment on which he was tried is as follows:
The court gave a number of instructions requested by parties among which was one for the territory, numbered 7. Appellant complains of said instruction. It is as follows: By said instruction the jury were advised that if they had a reasonable doubt of defendant's guilt of the crime of an assault to commit murder, they might find defendant guilty of the crime of an assault with a deadly weapon. The indictment is good as a charge for an assault to commit murder, and it also contains allegations which make it a good charge for an assault with a deadly weapon. An indictment is an accusation in writing, presented by the grand jury to a competent court, charging a person with a public offense. Pen. Code., par. 1409. The term "public offense" in this territory has the same meaning as the word "crime," and they may be used interchangeably. They are defined to mean an act committed or omitted in violation of a law forbidding or commanding it. Pen. Code, par. 15. Crimes are divided into felonies and misdemeanors. Pen. Code, par. 16. A felony is a crime which is punished with death, or by imprisonment in the territorial prison. Pen. Code, par. 17. An indictment must contain the title of the action, the names of the parties, a statement of the acts constituting the offense, in ordinary and concise language, and in such manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended. It is sufficient if, in the indictment, the name of the crime is given in its legal appellation, such as murder, arson, manslaughter, burglary, or the like, or to designate it as a felony, with a statement thereafter of the acts or omissions constituting the offense. The indictment must be certain as to (1) the party charged; (2) the offense charged; (3) the particular circumstances of the offense charged, when they are necessary to constitute a complete offense. In this territory, a crime which may be punished by imprisonment in the territorial prison, or by a fine or imprisonment in the county jail, is a felony, if imprisonment in the territorial prison be imposed. Pen. Code, par. 17. "An assault with a deadly weapon" is defined as follows: "Every person who commits an assault upon the person of another with a deadly weapon or instrument, or by any means or force likely to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Application of McLeod
...Mich. 24, 17 N.W. 226; In re Milburn, 59 Wis. 24, 17 N.W. 965; State v. Thomas, 65 N.J.L. 598, 48 A. 1007. In the case of Territory v. West, 4 Ariz. 212, 36 P. 207, the supreme court of Arizona holds: "Where an charges an assault to commit murder, and avers that the assault was made with a ......
-
State v. Balderrama
...194, 246, 62 P. 693, 64 P. 492; Riley v. State, 50 Ariz. 442, 73 P.2d 96; Bellamack v. State, 37 Ariz. 344, 294 P. 622; West v. Territory, 4 Ariz. 212, 36 P. 207; Richardson v. State, 34 Ariz. 139, 268 P. 615; Lee v. State, 27 Ariz. 52, 229 P. 939; State v. Voeckell, 69 Ariz. 145, 210 P.2d ......
-
Lee v. State
... ... Savercool, 81 Cal. 650, 22 P. 856. See Chief justice ... BAKER'S opinion in territory v. West, 4 ... Ariz. 212, 36 P. 207 ... Appellant ... complains of the court's rulings ... ...
-
State v. Singh
...higher. (Ex parte McLeod, 23 Idaho 257, 128 P. 1106, 43 L. R. A., N. S., 813; Territory v. Dooley, 4 Mont. 295, 1 P. 747; Territory v. West, 4 Ariz. 212, 36 P. 207; v. Crawford, 32 Idaho 165, 179 P. 511; 1 Wharton, Crim, Proc., 10th ed., sec. 299, p. 342; 3 Wharton, Crim. Proc., 10th ed., s......