Texas D.O.T. v. Aer-Aerotron Inc., 99-1070

Decision Date05 April 2001
Docket NumberNo. 99-1070,99-1070
Citation39 S.W.3d 220,44 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 406
Parties(Tex. 2001) Texas Department of Transportation, Petitioner v. Aer-Aerotron, Inc., Respondent
CourtTexas Supreme Court

On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Third District of Texas

Justice Baker delivered the opinion of the Court in which Chief Justice Phillips, Justice Hecht, Justice Owen, Justice Abbott, and Justice Hankinson joined.

The issue in this case involves whether the State may waive its immunity from suit by its conduct. The court of appeals held that by accepting benefits under a contract the State waives its immunity from suit. 997 S.W.2d 687, 692. We disagree. Today in General Services Commission v. Little-Tex Insulation Co., __ S.W.3d __ (Tex. 2001), we declined to adopt a waiver-by-conduct exception to sovereign immunity because the Legislature has established an administrative process for resolving certain breach-of-contract claims against the State. See Tex. Gov't Code § 2260.001-.108. Accordingly, we hold that Aer-Aerotron may not pursue its claim against the State without first participating in Chapter 2260's administrative process. See Little-Tex Insulation Co., __ S.W.3d at __. The trial court properly dismissed Aer-Aerotron's suit. We therefore reverse the courts of appeals' judgment and dismiss Aer-Aerotron's claim for want of jurisdiction.

Justice Enoch filed a dissenting opinion.

Justice O'Neill did not participate in the decision.

Justice Enoch, dissenting.

For the reasons expressed in my dissent in General Services Commission v. Little-Tex Insulation Company,1 I respectfully dissent.

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • University of Texas v. Loutzenhiser
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • July 9, 2004
    ...Government Code is a prerequisite to suit under chapter 107 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code); Texas Dep't of Transp. v. Aer-Aerotron, Inc., 39 S.W.3d 220, 220-221 (Tex.2001) 47. 988 S.W.2d 188, 189 (Tex.1998) (per curiam). 48. Id. 49. Id. at 188 (construing former Tex. Loc. Gov't Co......
  • Texas Natural Resource Conserv. V. It-Davy
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • April 11, 2002
    ...consolidated with Texas A & M University v. Dalmac Construction Co., 39 S.W.3d 591 (Tex. 2001); and Texas Department of Transportation v. Aer-Aerotron, Inc., 39 S.W.3d 220 (Tex.2001). We then granted the TNRCC's petition to determine whether sovereign immunity bars IT-Davy's II. JURISDICTIO......
  • Texas a & M University-Kingsville v. Lawson
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • June 20, 2002
    ...rev'd, 74 S.W.3d 849 (Tex.2002); Aer-Aerotron, Inc. v. Tex. Dep't of Transp., 997 S.W.2d 687, 691-92 (Tex.App.-Austin 1999), rev'd, 39 S.W.3d 220 (Tex.2001); Little-Tex Insulation Co. v. Gen. Servs. Comm'n, 997 S.W.2d 358, 364 (Tex.App.-Austin 1999), rev'd, 39 S.W.3d 591 (Tex.2001)). 5. Id.......
  • Texas Dot v. Jones Bros. Dirt & Paving
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • June 27, 2002
    ...IT-Davy, 74 S.W.3d 849 (Tex.2002); Gen. Servs. Comm'n v. Little-Tex Insulation Co., 39 S.W.3d 591 (Tex.2001); Tex. Dep't of Transp. v. Aer-Aerotron, Inc., 39 S.W.3d 220 (Tex. 2001); Federal Sign v. Tex. S. Univ., 951 S.W.2d 401 (Tex.1997); Tex. Dep't of Pub. Safety v. Int'l Capital Corp., 4......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT