Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. U.S.
| Decision Date | 16 March 1978 |
| Docket Number | No. 76-2056,76-2056 |
| Citation | 569 F.2d 874 |
| Parties | TEXAS EMPLOYERS' INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Before WISDOM, CLARK and RONEY, Circuit Judges.
The panel held that the United States can recover from the Texas Employers' Insurance Association the cost of medical services provided through a Veterans Administration hospital to an injured veteran-employee covered by the Texas Workmen's Compensation Act, Texas Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. arts. 8306-8309 (Vernon 1967). A companion case, United States v. Bender Welding & Machine Co., 558 F.2d 761 (5th Cir. 1977), allowed a similar recovery against an employer under the federal Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq.
Explicitly in Bender, and implicitly in this case, we relied on the employee's assignment to the Veterans Administration of his rights against the compensation carrier. See 558 F.2d at 764-765. A Veterans Administration regulation, 38 C.F.R. § 17.48(d) (1976), expressly authorizes the assignment. The Association argues that Texas Rev.Civ.Stat. art. 8306, § 3 (Vernon 1967) makes such an assignment void. See Texas Employers' Insurance Association v. United States, 390 F.Supp. 142, 149-150 (N.D.Texas 1975); Lively v. Blue Cross Hospital Service, Inc., 488 S.W.2d 474 (Tex.Civ.App.1972) (no writ).
State law, however, does not control this case. The Veterans Administration promulgated § 17.48(d) under its statutory rulemaking power, 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 210(c), 621. The regulation has the force of federal law. Under the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, Art. VI, cl. 2, a state may not condition a workmen's compensation scheme in a manner which frustrates the purpose of a national statute. Nash v. Florida Industrial Commission, 389 U.S. 235, 88 S.Ct. 362, 19 L.Ed.2d 438 (1967) ().
Application of the federal regulation here is but a minor trespass on the state scheme. See United States v. Kirkland, 405 F.Supp. 1024, 1030 (E.D.Tenn.1975). The purpose of prohibiting assignments is to protect employees against the improvident distribution of benefits meant to sustain them during their period of disability and to protect them against old creditors' claims. This assignment does not apply to any compensation benefits except those based on the reasonable charges for health care incurred. It operates to the benefit of the injured worker because it allows the Veterans Administration to give treatment first and worry later about whether the worker was entitled to free care because of inability to defray the costs, 38 U.S.C.A. § 610.
Also, the assignee here is the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ex parte Burson
...McJunkin v. Estate of McJunkin, 493 S.W.2d 278 (Tex.Civ.App. Dallas 1973, writ ref'd n. r. e.). See also Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. United States, 569 F.2d 874 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 826, 99 S.Ct. 98, 58 L.Ed.2d 119 Veterans Administration benefits are not divisible pro......
-
Quinteros v. Sparkle Cleaning, Inc., Civil Action No. AW-07-0628.
... ... employees of Defendant Regal nor are they joint employers with Defendant Sparkle. Furthermore, Defendant Regal ins that it is exempt from the overtime provisions under the ... See Brennan v. Texas City Dike & Marina, Inc., 492 F.2d 1115 (5th Cir.1974) ... ...
-
Hokansen v. U.S.
...under this statutory rule-making power are controlling instead of a conflicting state statute. See Texas Employers' Insurance Association v. United States, 569 F.2d 874 (5th Cir.1978). It is true that the Federal Tort Claims Act incorporates negligence principles from state law. 28 U.S.C. S......
-
United States v. Transou
...U.S.C. § 210(c)(1). These regulations have the force of law. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. U.S., 558 F.2d 766 (5th Cir.1978) reh. 569 F.2d 874, 875 (1978), cert. den., 439 U.S. 826, 99 S.Ct. 98, 58 L.Ed.2d 119 Through that Administrator's department of medicine and surgery, he functions to......