Texas State Bank v. First Nat. Bank
Decision Date | 28 March 1914 |
Docket Number | (No. 7880.) |
Citation | 168 S.W. 504 |
Parties | TEXAS STATE BANK OF WALNUT SPRINGS et al. v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF MERIDIAN et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Bosque County Court; S. P. Hale, Judge.
Action by the First National Bank of Meridian and others against the Texas State Bank of Walnut Springs and others, in which defendants filed a plea over against W. A. Lee. From judgments for plaintiffs against defendant bank and for defendant bank against defendant Lee, both defendants appeal. Affirmed as to the bank and reversed and remanded as to Lee.
H. S. Dillard, B. J. Word, J. P. Word, and S. H. Lumpkin, all of Meridian, for appellants. Cureton & Cureton, of Meridian, and Davis & Cocke, of Waco, for appellees.
Will Gotcher forged the name of W. B. Griffin to a check drawn on the Farmers' State Bank of Meridian, Tex., for $800, payable to N. W. Murffey or bearer. Gotcher representing himself to be Murffey, the payee, presented the check to B. E. Seale, cashier of the Texas State Bank of Walnut Springs, Tex., to be cashed, telling Seale that he had just sold some mules to W. B. Griffin, and that the check was given for the purchase price of same. He was a stranger to Seale at that time, but represented that he was a neighbor of Griffin. He stated that he desired to open an account with the Texas State Bank of Walnut Springs, and desired $450 in cash on the check, and $350 to be deposited to his credit in that bank. The cashier complied with this request, and forwarded the check to its correspondent bank at Waco for collection, having first indorsed it as follows:
The bank who first received it for collection was the Citizens' National Bank of Waco. That bank forwarded it to the City National Bank of Galveston, who in turn sent it to the First National Bank of Meridian. The bank last named presented it to the drawee, the Farmers' Guaranty State Bank of Meridian, who refused payment because W. B. Griffin, whose name appeared as drawer of the check, had no account in that bank. But W. B. Griffin did have an account with the First National Bank of Meridian at that time, and the officers of that bank, acting upon the supposition that W. B. Griffin had intended to draw the check upon that bank, instead of the drawee bank, stamped the name of the First National Bank of Meridian, Tex., on the face of the check just above the name of the drawee bank, then charged it to W. B. Griffin, and forwarded the amount of the check to the Galveston bank. Through the Galveston bank and the Waco bank the amount so collected was paid over to the Walnut Springs bank. Later the First National Bank of Meridian was informed by Griffin that the check was a forgery, and his account thereupon was credited with the amount of the check that had been charged against him. The cashier of the Walnut Springs bank, having been informed of the forgery, paid over to the First National Bank of Meridian $350 which had been placed to the credit of the forger, and which had never been drawn out by him, but refused to pay the balance, $450, which Gotcher had already collected.
Thereupon the First National Bank of Meridian instituted this suit against the Walnut Springs bank to recover such balance. In its petition plaintiff alleged substantially that defendant was guilty of negligence in purchasing the check without detecting the forgery; that Gotcher was a stranger to defendant's cashier at the time, and that the cashier had the means and opportunity of ascertaining whether or not the signature to the check was genuine, and was charged with the duty so to do before purchasing and forwarding the check for collection, and that by his acts in so purchasing, indorsing, and forwarding the check for collection plaintiff was led to believe that the check was genuine, and, acting upon such belief, paid it.
In its answer to plaintiff's petition, the defendant bank pleaded a general denial, and specially that plaintiff, in cashing the check purporting to have been signed by W. B. Griffin, who was a depositor of that bank, without discovering the forgery, was guilty of negligence precluding a recovery; and by way of a special refutation of the charge of negligence against it further alleged the circumstances recited above under which defendant bank accepted the check from Gotcher and paid him the $450 and deposited the balance to his credit.
Defendant also filed a plea over against W. A. Lee alleging that Gotcher paid the $450 he had received from defendant bank to Lee. Defendant further alleged that at the time Lee received the money he knew, or had reason to believe, that Gotcher had obtained it from defendant bank by fraud, and by committing forgery, and that Lee had paid no consideration therefor. It was further alleged that after Lee received the money, and while all the means which he possessed for enforcing any demand he held against Gotcher were still available to him, he was advised by defendant bank of such forgery; notwithstanding which he refused to pay over the money to defendant bank, and converted it to his own use. A prayer for recovery against Lee was predicated upon the facts so alleged. In addition to a general denial of the facts alleged in the plea over against him, Lee alleged negligence on the part of defendant bank in paying the money to Gotcher, a stranger, without making any effort to discover whether or not the check was genuine; further, that if any part of the money was paid to him he received it in good faith and in due course of trade, without any notice of the forgery; that he had credited the payment upon a valid debt owing to him by Gotcher, which was well secured by chattel mortgage on stock of value in excess of the amount of money so received; and that it will now be impossible to reinstate such original debt and security.
The testimony showed without controversy that soon after the transaction between Gotcher and defendant bank Gotcher paid to Lee $450 on a note he owed to Lee, and to secure which he had executed a mortgage on about 60 head of cattle.
The transaction between Gotcher and defendant bank was through B. E. Seale, its cashier, who after identifying the forged check, testified as follows:
J. M. Rudasill, president of plaintiff bank, testified as follows:
C. W. Tidwell, active vice president of plaintiff bank, testified with reference to the check:
The trial judge instructed the jury to return a verdict in favor of the plaintiff against defendant bank for the $450 sued for, with interest, which was done.
Upon the plea...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
First Nat. Bank v. Wood County
...Bank, 63 Tex. 610; Iron City Nat. Bank of Llano v. Peyton, 15 Tex. Civ. App. 184, 39 S. W. 223; Texas State Bank of Walnut Springs v. First Nat. Bank of Meridian (Tex. Civ. App.) 168 S. W. 504. See 10 L. R. A. (N. S.) page 50, note; 12 A. L. R. page 1099, note; 94 Am. St. Rep. page 642, not......
-
Burnett's Trust v. Farmers State Bank in Mexia, 2536.
...peril, as to the manner in which such money was procured by the payor." See, also, Young v. Pecos County, supra; Texas State Bank v. First Nat. Bank, Tex. Civ.App., 168 S.W. 504; Texas Sporting Goods Co. v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., Tex. Civ.App., 81 S.W.2d 805; Greneaux v. Wheeler, 6 Tex. 51......
-
American Surety Co. of New York v. Bache
...Bank v. Gibert & Clay, 123 La. 845, 49 So. 593, 25 L. R. A. (N. S.) 631, 131 Am. St. Rep. 382; Texas State Bank of Walnut Springs v. First Nat. Bank of Meridian (Tex. Civ. App.) 168 S. W. 504, writ of error dismissed; Case v. Hammond Packing Co., 105 Mo. App. 168, 79 S. W. 732 (Kansas City ......
-
W. Horace Williams Co. v. Vandaveer, Brown & Stoy
...who surrenders the evidence of an existing debt in consideration of money paid." For further authorities see Texas State Bank v. First National Bank (Tex. Civ. App.) 168 S. W. 504; First National Bank v. City National Bank, 102 Mo. App. 357, 76 S. W. The rule above stated relative to paymen......