The State v. Ed Nash

Decision Date04 June 1920
Citation222 S.W. 396,283 Mo. 32
PartiesTHE STATE v. ED NASH and DUTCH FORGEY, Appellants
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from Christian Circuit Court. -- Hon. Fred Stewart, Judge.

Affirmed.

Frank W. McAllister, Attorney-General, C. P. Le Mire, Assistant Attorney-General, and William L. Vandeventer for respondent.

(1) There are numerous reported cases in this State holding that an information which follows the words of the statute on which it is based, is sufficient; and there are also many cases holding that the same strictness of pleading is not required in misdemeanors as in felonies. Sec. 4713, R. S 1909; State v. Schieneman, 64 Mo. 386; State v Ellis, 71 Mo.App. 269; State v. Stegall, 65 Mo.App. 243; State v. Stubblefield, 32 Mo. 563; State v. Robertson, 262 Mo. 621; City of Eldorado v. Highfill, 188 S.W. 68. (2) The information in this case charges an offense under Sec. 4713, R. S. 1909 in the exact language of the statute.

OPINION

WILLIAMS, P. J.

Upon an information charging them with disturbing a congregation of people met for religious worship, defendants were tried in the Circuit Court of Christian County, found guilty and each fined the sum of one dollar.

Thereupon defendants duly appealed to the Spring-field Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment. The opinion therein will be found reported in 216 S.W. 1004. The case was certified here on the ground that the opinion therein conflicted with certain opinions of the St. Louis Court of Appeals and the Kansas City Court of Appeals.

The only question involved is as to the sufficiency of the information which, omitting formal parts, is as follows:

"William L. Vandeventer, prosecuting attorney, within and for the County of Christian, in the State of Missouri, informs the court upon his official oath -- that Dewey Ladd, Clarence Smith, Ed Nash and Dutch Forgey, on or about the 16th day of March, 1919, in the said County of Christian, in the State of Missouri, did then and there, unlawfully, willfully maliciously and contemptuously, disturb and disquiet a congregation of people then and there met for religious worship, by then and there making a loud noise, and by rude and indecent behavior within their place of worship and so near the same as to disturb the order and solemnity of the meeting; contrary to the form of the statute in such cases made and provided and against the peace and dignity of...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT