Thomas v. Coastal Indus. Services, Inc.

Decision Date09 April 1959
Docket NumberNo. 20401,20401
Citation214 Ga. 832,108 S.E.2d 328
PartiesJoseph C. THOMAS v. COASTAL INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

J. Walter Cowart, Thomas Delano Maurice, Savannah, for plaintiff in error.

Corish, Alexander & Shea, Savannah, for defendant in error.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

MOBLEY, Justice.

The exception is to the judgment of the Superior Court of Chatham County overruling the general demurrer to the petition of Coastal Industrial Services, Inc., and to the granting of a temporary injunction against the defendant. The petitioner sought to enjoin the defendant from violating the terms of a contract of employment, in which the defendant agreed that, during his employment and for a year after its termination, he would not solicit business or patronage of the kind he had performed for the petitioner from any person whomsoever in 34 named Georgia counties and 12 named South Carolina counties. The court enjoined the defendant from doing such business in 31 of the 34 Georgia counties named in the contract. Held:

1. 'Though a promise may be nudum pactum when made because the promisee is not bound, it becomes binding when he subsequently furnishes the consideration contemplated by doing what he was expected to do.' Brown v. Bowman, 119 Ga. 153(1), 46 S.E. 410. Even though the agreement does not disclose what salary the defendant was to be paid or the length of time he was to be employed by the plaintiff, and despite the fact that the defendant was already employed by the plaintiff at the time the agreement was entered into, mutuality and sufficient consideration to vitalize the ancillary agreement were supplied by performance under the agreement. Breed v. National Credit Ass'n, 211 Ga. 629, 632, 88 S.E.2d 15. Accordingly, the covenant sued upon was not void for lack of consideration; and the trial court properly overruled the demurrers.

2. Although contracts in general restraint of trade are void as being contrary to public policy (Code, § 20-504), 'a contract concerning a lawful and useful business in partial restraint of trade and reasonably limited as to time and territory is not void.' Black v. Horowitz, 203 Ga. 294, 46 S.E.2d 346, 347. Unquestionably, under many rulings of this court, the time limitation of one year in this case is reasonable. Griffin v. Vandegriff, 205 Ga. 288, 295, 53 S.E.2d 345. Reasonableness as to territory depends not so much on the geographical size of the territory as on the reasonableness of the territorial restriction in view of the facts and circumstances of the case. Rakestraw v. Lanier, 104 Ga. 188, 195, 30 S.E. 735. '* * * as a matter of law, such a contract is to be upheld if the restraint imposed is not unreasonable, is founded on a valuable consideration, and is reasonably necessary to protect the interest of the party in whose favor it is imposed, and does not unduly prejudice the interests of the public.' 104 Ga. at page 194, 30 S.E. at page 738. The evidence showed that the plaintiff company did business in only 31 of the 34 named Georgia counties, and that it did no business in the South Carolina counties included in the territory in which the defendant was restricted from working and had no intention of doing so. The plaintiff company is engaged in the business of renting uniforms, wiping cloths, etc., to service stations, garages and similar...

To continue reading

Request your trial
29 cases
  • Central Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Ingram
    • United States
    • Tennessee Supreme Court
    • 17 Septiembre 1984
    ...regard the covenant as binding if there is actual performance of the promise of continued employment. In Thomas v. Coastal Industrial Services, 214 Ga. 832, 108 S.E.2d 328 (1959), the court stated its reasoning as "Though a promise may be nudum pactum when made because the promisee is not b......
  • Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. Stidham
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Georgia
    • 15 Enero 1981
    ...reasonableness of the territorial restriction in view of the facts and circumstance surrounding the case. Thomas v. Coastal Industrial Services, 214 Ga. 832, 108 S.E.2d 328 (1959). "Insofar as territorial restrictions are concerned, those which relate to the territory in which the employee ......
  • Gill Plumbing Co. v. Jimenez.Jimenez v. Gill Plumbing Co..
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 30 Noviembre 2011
    ...the lack of consideration can be cured by performance, rendering the contract binding and enforceable. See Thomas v. Coastal Indus. Svcs., 214 Ga. 832(1), 108 S.E.2d 328 (1959). Both the president of Gill Plumbing and Jimenez testified that he was paid $167,000 by Gill Plumbing for performi......
  • Seaboard Industries, Inc. v. Blair
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 3 Febrero 1971
    ...as on the reasonablenss of the territorial restriction in view of the facts and circumstances of the case.' Thomas v. Coastal Industrial Services, Inc., 214 Ga. 832, 108 S.E.2d 328. 'A contract, for instance, for a valid consideration, not to engage in the manufacture and sale of firearms i......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
  • Restrictions on Post-employment Competition by an Executive Under Georgia Law - Steven E. Harbour
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 54-3, March 2003
    • Invalid date
    ...Id. at 330-31, 349 S.E.2d at 178, 180. 66. 234 Ga. App. 298, 506 S.E.2d 670 (1998). 67. Id. at 300-01, 506 S.E.2d at 672-73. 68. 214 Ga. 832, 108 S.E.2d 328 (1959). 69. Id. at 833-34, 108 S.E.2d at 330. 70. 251 Ga. 536, 307 S.E.2d 914 (1983). 71. Id. at 538, 307 S.E.2d at 916-17. 72. Id. at......
  • Labor & Employment Law
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 71-1, January 2020
    • Invalid date
    ...W.R. Grace & Co., Dearborn Div. v. Mouyal, 262 Ga. 464, 465, 422 S.E.2d 529, 531 (1992). 121. See Thomas v. Coastal Indus. Servs., Inc., 214 Ga. 832, 832, 108 S.E.2d 328, 329 (1959).122. See Glisson v. Global Sec. Servs., LLC, 287 Ga. App. 640, 641-42, 653 S.E.2d 85, 87 (2007).123. 347 Ga. ......
  • Labor & Employment Law
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 72-1, September 2020
    • Invalid date
    ...Structures, Inc. v. McCarty, 329 Ga. App. 220, 220, 764 S.E.2d 458, 459 (2014). 94. Id.95. Thomas v. Costal Industrial Services, Inc., 214 Ga. 832, 832, 108 S.E.2d 328, 329 (1959).96. Glisson v. Global Sec. Services, L.L.C., 287 Ga. App. 640, 641-642, 653 S.E.2d 85, 86-87 (2007).97. 354 Ga.......
  • Keeping Your Genies in the Bottle: 10 Steps to Protect Your Most Sensitive Secrets
    • United States
    • State Bar of Georgia Georgia Bar Journal No. 14-4, December 2008
    • Invalid date
    ...reasonable step to maintain the secrecy of information). [6] O.C.G.A. § 10-1-761(4)(B) (2000). [7] Thomas v. Coastal Indus. Servs., Inc., 214 Ga. 832, 832, 108 S.E.2d 328, 329 (1959). [8] Note, however, that even in states such as Georgia where continued at-will employment serves as suffici......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT