Thomas v. State
Citation | 540 S.E.2d 662,246 Ga. App. 448 |
Decision Date | 20 October 2000 |
Docket Number | No. A00A1618.,A00A1618. |
Parties | THOMAS v. The STATE. |
Court | United States Court of Appeals (Georgia) |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Richard Green II, for appellant.
J. Tom Morgan, District Attorney, Robert M. Coker, Thomas S. Clegg, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.
Renard Carlos Thomas was tried before a jury and found guilty of aggravated assault, false imprisonment, and aggravated stalking for acts committed against his former girlfriend, Karen Grundy. In five related enumerations of error, he challenges the denial of his motion for new trial on the special ground of ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.
Thomas's first specification of ineffective assistance is that trial counsel "failed to comprehend the meaning of `similar transaction evidence,' and therefore failed to timely object to introduction of same." The similar transactions involved Thomas's 1991 guilty plea to simple battery against his then-wife Marguerite Thomas, by "grabbing her and dragging her on the ground," and his 1992 guilty plea to aggravated assault against her by shooting a handgun in her direction.
Trial counsel, aged 79, had a 50-year career in the law but did not have many criminal trials in his practice. Counsel was under the erroneous impression that similar transaction evidence was admissible only for purposes of sentencing. Computer research by counsel's paralegal produced nothing useful. Nevertheless, at the hearing prescribed by Uniform Superior Court Rule 31.3(B), counsel did object to this evidence on the ground that it was stale. He obtained a contemporaneous limiting instruction on the permissible uses for such similar transaction evidence, when it was offered at trial.
The similar transaction evidence that Thomas was jealous, emotionally and physically abusive, and obsessively controlling in his relationship with his former wife closely paralleled that of Karen Grundy in the case on trial.
In cases of domestic violence, prior incidents of abuse against family members or sexual partners are more generally permitted because there is a logical connection between violent acts against two different persons with whom the accused had a similar emotional or intimate attachment. 2
Thus, testimony from a former spouse that the accused had beaten, kicked, slapped, and threatened to kill her is admissible to prove a continuing course of abusive and intimidating conduct.3 And proof of an unrelated shooting is admissible where relevant to show the accused's propensity to use a gun.4
We assume that trial counsel's assistance fell below an objectively reasonable standard when he failed to possess that familiarity with similar transaction evidence and persuasive challenges thereto expected of a reasonably effective criminal defense advocate, and also when he failed to obtain that familiarity through effective legal research. Nevertheless, we hold that trial counsel's ineffective challenge to admissible similar transaction evidence is harmless in this instance because that ineffectiveness cannot reasonably be shown to have changed the outcome of the trial. Since Thomas failed to prove the prejudice element of the necessary showing, the trial court did not err in denying Thomas's motion for new trial based on this specification.5 The first two enumerations are without merit.
2. In the other three enumerations of error,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Simmons v. State
...(1984). We will not disturb a trial court's finding of effective assistance of counsel unless clearly erroneous. Thomas v. State, 246 Ga.App. 448, 449(1), 540 S.E.2d 662 (2000). (a) Simmons contends that trial counsel's reference to him as a "dog" during his closing argument did not meet th......
-
Daniel v. State
...a defendant can establish that his trial counsel's conduct fell below an objective standard of reasonableness. Thomas v. State , 246 Ga.App. 448, 450 (1), 540 S.E.2d 662 (2000)."Defendants have a Sixth Amendment right to counsel, a right that extends to the plea-bargaining process." (Citati......
-
Hall v. The State
...two different persons with whom the accused had a similar emotional or intimate attachment.(Footnote omitted.) Thomas v. State, 246 Ga.App. 448, 449(1), 540 S.E.2d 662 (2000). Contrary to appellant's further assertion, the 15- and 13-year lapses of time between the prior incidents and the c......
-
Johnson v. State
...(1984). We will not disturb a trial court's finding of effective assistance of counsel unless clearly erroneous. Thomas v. State, 246 Ga.App. 448, 449(1), 540 S.E.2d 662 (2000). Defendant contends that trial counsel was unprepared to defend her at trial because he met with her only twice pr......