Thompson, In re
| Decision Date | 06 July 1973 |
| Docket Number | No. 39495,39495 |
| Citation | 209 N.W.2d 412,296 Minn. 466 |
| Parties | In re Application for the Discipline of Tilmer Eugene THOMPSON, an Attorney at Law of the State of Minnesota. |
| Court | Minnesota Supreme Court |
R. B. Reavill, State Administrative Director on Professional Conduct, St. Paul, Herbert C. Davis, St. Louis Park, for appellant.
Tilmer Eugene Thompson, pro se.
Melvin B. Goldberg, Director Legal Assistance to Prisoners, Minneapolis, amicus curiae.
Heard and considered en banc.
A petition has been filed with this court by the administrative director on professional conduct, 1 requesting the disbarment of Tilmer Eugene Thompson, who was convicted of first-degree murder. The petition was served upon respondent, and the matter was referred by this court to the Honorable Robert B. Gillespie, a judge of the Tenth Judicial District, for an evidentiary hearing. After a hearing in which respondent appeared pro se, the referee made findings of fact and a recommendation that respondent be disbarred as an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Minnesota.
Respondent was licensed to practice law in Minnesota on October 4, 1955. On December 6, 1963, judgment was entered in Hennepin County District Court upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of murder in the first degree, and he was sentenced to the State Prison in Stillwater for a term of life imprisonment. By order of this court, dated May 4, 1964, he was suspended from the practice of law until the final determination of any appeal taken from his conviction. 268 Minn. 570, 129 N.W.2d 46 (1964). Respondent's murder conviction was subsequently affirmed by this court. State v. Thompson, 273 Minn. 1, 139 N.W.2d 490 (1966). The United States Supreme Court denied certiorari, 385 U.S. 817, 87 S.Ct. 39, 17 L.Ed.2d 56 (1966). A habeas corpus petition before the Federal district court was denied because respondent had not exhausted this state's postconviction remedies. Thompson v. Tahash, 286 F.Supp. 663 (D.Minn.1968). Subsequently, the Hennepin County District Court denied respondent's petition for postconviction relief, and we affirmed that denial. Thompson v. State, 289 Minn. 270, 183 N.W.2d 771 (1971).
Respondent claims that since he intends to file another habeas corpus petition in Federal district court his conviction is not final, and this proceeding should be delayed until his proposed petition is heard and finally determined. Federal habeas corpus provides a remedy for jurisdictional and constitutional errors at trial without any limit of time for filing the petition. United States v. Smith, 331 U.S. 469, 67 S.Ct. 1330, 91 L.Ed. 1610 (1947); 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241. We should not be required to wait indefinitely for Federal habeas corpus petitions or speculate on the merits of possible future petitions. The conviction and the denial of postconviction relief have both been affirmed by this court. In our opinion, for the purposes of this disciplinary proceeding, respondent's conviction is finally affirmed.
Respondent requested the referee to appoint an attorney to represent him in these proceedings. Since respondent made no claim of indigency, however, we need not decide whether an attorney in disciplinary proceedings is entitled to court-appointed counsel.
Respondent also contended before the referee that the crime for which he was convicted did not relate directly to the practice of law. It is well settled, however, that murder by an attorney constitutes a ground for disciplinary action against him. Annotation, 21 A.L.R.3d 887. Both the United States Supreme Court and this court have recognized murder as sufficient grounds for disbarment. Ex Parte Wall, 107 U.S. 265, 2 S.Ct. 569, 27 L.Ed. 552 (1883); In re Discipline of Johnson, 274 Minn. 560, 143 N.W.2d 382 (1966); In re Discipline of Ryan, 269 Minn. 577, 130 N.W.2d 534 (1964). Respondent admitted before the referee that he has been convicted of first-degree murder, a felony. It is our judgment that this conviction requires his disbarment.
Respondent, in his pro se oral argument before this court,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Bonner, A15-1813
... ... We need not decide whether the misappropriation of law firm funds always relates to the practice of law, because Bonner's conduct constitutes grounds for disciplinary action against him. See In re Thompson , 296 Minn. 466, 209 N.W.2d 412, 413 (1973) (declining to address whether a crime directly related to the practice of law as "[i]t is well settled ... that murder by an attorney constitutes a ground for disciplinary action against him"). Bonner was convicted of felony theft by swindle; therefore, ... ...
-
In re Farley, No. A08-1178.
... ... 4. See, e.g., In re Poindexter, 493 N.W.2d 539, 540 (Minn. 1992) (disbarring attorney pursuant to fraud conviction unrelated to the practice of law); In re Wegner, 291 N.W.2d 678, 678-79 (1979) (disbarring attorney pursuant to drug smuggling conviction); In re Thompson, 296 Minn. 466, 469, 209 N.W.2d 412, 414 (1973) (disbarring attorney pursuant to murder conviction) ... 5. See, e.g., In re Martinez, 718 N.W.2d 878, 878 (Minn.2006) (imposing six-month suspension as stipulated to by the parties) ... 6. See, e.g., In re Flyrin, 679 N.W.2d 330, 330 (Minn.2004) ... ...
-
In re Huff, A14–0024.
... ... Poindexter, 493 N.W.2d 539, 540 (Minn.1992) (order) (disbarring an attorney for a fraud conviction unrelated to the practice of law); In re Wegner, 291 N.W.2d 678, 67879 (Minn.1979) (disbarring an attorney who was convicted of conspiracy to import marijuana into the United States); In re Thompson, 296 Minn. 466, 46769, 209 N.W.2d 412, 41314 (1973) (disbarring an attorney who was convicted of first-degree murder). Similar to these cases, Huff's misconduct, 872 N.W.2d 755although unrelated to the practice of law, gave rise to a felony drug conviction.Huff's felony drug conviction is ... ...
-
In re Pitera
... ... See In re Biber, 791 N.W.2d 132, 132 (Minn.2010) (disbarring attorney who was convicted of first-degree criminal sexual conduct); In re Thompson, 296 Minn. 466, 46769, 209 N.W.2d 412, 41314 (Minn.1973) (disbarring attorney who was convicted of first-degree murder). We have also imposed an indefinite suspension for at least 5 years on an attorney whose underlying criminal conduct involved two acts of violence. See In re Gherity, 673 N.W.2d ... ...