Thompson v. The State
Decision Date | 29 March 2010 |
Docket Number | No. S10A0566.,S10A0566. |
Citation | 692 S.E.2d 379,286 Ga. 889 |
Parties | THOMPSONv.The STATE. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Gerard B. Kleinrock, Decatur, for appellant.
Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming, District Attorney, Deborah D. Wellborn, Assistant District Attorney, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Benjamin H. Pierman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
A jury found Carl Thompson guilty of felony murder, armed robbery, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime. The trial court entered judgments of conviction and sentenced Thompson to life imprisonment for the felony murder and to a consecutive five-year term for the firearm offense. The armed robbery merged with the felony murder conviction. Thompson appeals after the denial of a motion for new trial.*
1. Construed most strongly in support of the verdicts, the evidence shows that Thompson and others arranged to buy marijuana from the victim, James Avery. When they met at the site of the drug deal, Thompson shot and killed Avery, and stole the marijuana. The evidence was sufficient for a rational trier of fact to find Thompson guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crimes for which he was convicted. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).
2. Thompson contends that the armed robbery count of the indictment is defective because it fails to allege the essential element that the property taken was the “property of another.” OCGA § 16-8-41(a). He acknowledges that this alleged defect is moot as to the armed robbery itself, since that offense merged with the felony murder. However, he claims that it still fatally infects the felony murder and the firearm counts of the indictment, which are both predicated on the armed robbery.
The “contention that the felony murder [and firearm counts of the] indictment [are] deficient because [they do] not contain all the essential elements of the underlying crime of [armed robbery] is, in essence, a special demurrer seeking greater specificity with regard to the predicate felony.” [Cit.]
Dasher v. State, 285 Ga. 308, 309-310(2), 676 S.E.2d 181 (2009). Pursuant to OCGA § 17-7-110, a special demurrer must be filed within ten days after the arraignment. Palmer v. State, 282 Ga. 466, 468, 651 S.E.2d 86 (2007). In this case, Thompson did not file a special demurrer in the trial court. Instead, he raised this issue for the first time orally, at the end of the motion for new trial hearing. Dasher v. State, supra at 310(2), 676 S.E.2d 181. Because Thompson did not file a timely special demurrer, “ ‘the ground [has been] waived[.]’ ” Stinson v. State, 279 Ga. 177, 180(2), 611 S.E.2d 52 (2005). See also Roberts v. State, 282 Ga. 548, 550(4), 651 S.E.2d 689 (2007) (special demurrer waived).
Dasher v. State, supra. Here, however, the motion was filed several terms after the term of court in which the judgment was rendered. OCGA § 15-6-3(37) ( ).
Thompson further argues that the felony murder and firearm possession counts of the indictment are deficient because, even though they identify their respective underlying crimes, they fail to specify that those crimes are felonies. This challenge to the indictment was never raised in the trial court, and thus it cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. Hall v. State, 241...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Brown v. State, S17A0826.
...failure to raise it in the trial court. See Bighams v. State , 296 Ga. 267, 269–270 (2), 765 S.E.2d 917 (2014) ; Thompson v. State , 286 Ga. 889, 890 (2), 692 S.E.2d 379 (2010), overruled on other grounds, State v. Kelly , 290 Ga. 29, 32 (1), 718 S.E.2d 232 (2011). With respect to certain o......
-
State v. Kelly
...State, 287 Ga. 121(3), 694 S.E.2d 652 (2010) (finding waiver of unpreserved error without addressing plain error); Thompson v. State, 286 Ga. 889(3), 692 S.E.2d 379 (2010) (same); Hatcher v. State, 286 Ga. 491(4), 690 S.E.2d 174 (2010) (same); Metz v. State, 284 Ga. 614(5), 669 S.E.2d 121 (......
-
Collier v. the State.
...issues were similarly deemed waived, citing Metz, without discussion of plain error or the merits of the issue. See Thompson v. State, 286 Ga. 889, 891, 692 S.E.2d 379 (2010); Hatcher v. State, 286 Ga. 491, 494, 690 S.E.2d 174 (2010). See also Madrigal, 287 Ga. at 122–123, 694 S.E.2d 652 (h......
-
Williams v. The State
... ... David S. Klein, Augusta, for appellant.Ashley Wright, District Attorney, Charles R. Sheppard, Assistant District Attorney, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Reggie A. Lampkin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.THOMPSON, Justice. ... Bryan Tyrone Williams was convicted of malice murder and various other crimes in connection with the shooting death of Officer Michael Stephenson of the Richmond County Board of Education Public Safety Department, while in the performance of his official duties.1 ... ...
-
Criminal Law
...(2010); Hicks v. State, 287 Ga. 260, 695 S.E.2d 195 (2010) with Madrigal v. State, 287 Ga. 121, 694 S.E.2d 652 (2010); Thompson v. State, 286 Ga. 889, 692 S.E.2d 379 (2010); Hatcher v. State, 286 Ga. 491, 690 S.E.2d 174 (2010); Metz v. State, 284 Ga. 614, 669 S.E.2d 121 (2008).216. Kelly, 2......