Tiedeman v. City of Miami
Citation | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1971,529 So.2d 1266 |
Decision Date | 23 August 1988 |
Docket Number | No. 87-2850,87-2850 |
Parties | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1971 James TIEDEMAN and Albert Whitehead, Appellants, v. CITY OF MIAMI, a municipality and political subdivision of the State of Florida, and Show Management, Inc., Appellees. |
Court | Court of Appeal of Florida (US) |
Kaplan, Sicking & Bloom and Kathleen M. Phillips, Miami, for appellants.
Lucia A. Dougherty, City Atty. and Linda G. Kelly, Asst. City Atty., Miami, Alley & Alley and John Edward Alley, Tampa, for appellees.
Before HUBBART and NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
The final order which denies the plaintiffs' motion for temporary injunction and dismisses the plaintiffs' motion for injunctive relief is affirmed upon a holding that (a) the complaint failed to allege, as required by law, see Boucher v. Novotny, 102 So.2d 132, 134-35 (Fla.1958); Central & S. Fla. Flood Control Dist. v. Scott, 169 So.2d 368, 370 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964), that the plaintiffs had standing under the special injury rule, or an exception thereto, to bring the instant lawsuit to open a temporarily closed public boat ramp at the Dinner Key Marina in Miami, Florida, see North Broward Hosp. Dist. v. Fornes, 476 So.2d 154, 155-56 (Fla.1985); O'Dell v. Walsh, 81 So.2d 554, 555 (Fla.1955); Paul v. Blake, 376 So.2d 256, 259 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); and (b) it was plain on this record that the plaintiffs could not by amendment have possibly shown any standing to bring this lawsuit. See Mhoon v. Singleton, 503 So.2d 374, 375 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Winchester Corp. v. Miami Free Zone Corp., 443 So.2d 1064 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); see also Dade County Police Benevolent Ass'n v. Metropolitan Dade County, 452 So.2d 6, 10 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) (on rehearing), rev. denied, 461 So.2d 114 (Fla.1985).
The final order which awards attorney's fees to the defendant Show Management, Inc. under Section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1987), is affirmed upon a holding that (a) the entire lawsuit presented no justiciable issue of law or fact because there was no way on this record that the plaintiffs could have ever shown standing to bring this lawsuit or could have otherwise succeeded on the merits, Whitten v. Progressive Casualty Ins. Co., 410 So.2d 501 (Fla.1982); New England Rare Coin Galleries, Inc. v. Robertson, 506 So.2d 1161 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Puder v. Raymond Int'l Builders, Inc., 424 So.2d 78 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), rev. denied, 434 So.2d 888 (Fla.1983); (b) attorney's fees were properly awardable under the above statute for, among other things, litigating the amount of fee to be awarded, cf. Johnson v. Mississippi, 606 F.2d 635, 637-38 (5th Cir.1979); Prandini v. National Tea Co., 585 F.2d 47, 53-54 (3d Cir.1978); Castaway Lounge of Bay County, Inc. v. Reid, 411 So.2d 282, 285 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); and (c) there is no basis to upset the amount of the award as urged by the defendant Show Management, Inc. on the cross appeal. See Bill Rivers Trailers, Inc. v. Miller, 489 So.2d 1139, 1143 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Hanlon v. A.P. Clark Motors, Inc., 487 So.2d 427, 427 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Florida Homes Constr. Co. v. Execu*Sys. of Cent. Fla., Inc., 393 So.2d 648 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).
The final order awarding attorney's fees to the City of Miami under Section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1987), is reversed upon a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Visoly v. Security Pacific Credit Corp., 3D99-1155.
...690 So.2d 603 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Brahmbhatt v. Allstate Indem. Co., 655 So.2d 1264 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Tiedeman v. City of Miami, 529 So.2d 1266 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). We recognize that to some extent, the definition of "frivolous" is incapable of precise determination.14 Nevertheless, a re......
-
Muckerman v. Burris
...Allen v. Estate of Dutton, 384 So.2d 171 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), review denied, 392 So.2d 1373 (Fla.1980); accord Tiedeman v. City of Miami, 529 So.2d 1266 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). "Merely losing, either on the pleadings or by summary judgment, is not enough to invoke the operation of the statute."......
-
State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Palma
...the time spent litigating entitlement to attorney fees."), quashed on other grounds, 566 So.2d 791 (Fla.1990); Tiedeman v. City of Miami, 529 So.2d 1266, 1267 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) ("[A]ttorney's fees were properly awardable under the ... statute for, among other things, litigating the amount ......
-
Pirretti v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
...v. Miller, 489 So.2d 1139 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); B & L Motors, Inc. v. Bignotti, 427 So.2d 1070 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Tiedeman v. City of Miami, 529 So.2d 1266 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Earnest v. Southeastern Fidelity Ins. Co., 407 So.2d 995 (Fla. 3d DCA We recognize that the court's discretion to a......