Todd v. Missouri United School Ins. Council, No. SC 88020.
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of Missouri |
| Writing for the Court | William Ray Price, Jr. |
| Citation | 223 S.W.3d 156 |
| Docket Number | No. SC 88020. |
| Decision Date | 29 May 2007 |
| Parties | Holly TODD and Kodey Todd, by and through Next Friend Holly Todd, Appellants, v. MISSOURI UNITED SCHOOL INSURANCE COUNCIL, Respondent. |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
161 practice notes
-
Allied Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Stuart, Case No. 4:16–CV–806 (CEJ)
...is made up of both the general insuring agreement as well as the exclusions and definitions." Todd v. Missouri United Sch. Ins. Council , 223 S.W.3d 156, 163 (Mo. 2007) (en banc). In construing the terms of an insurance policy, Missouri courts apply "the meaning an ordinary person of averag......
-
In re Generali COVID-19 Travel Ins. Litig., 20-md-2968 (JGK)
...resolved in favor of the insured. This argument is without merit. The plaintiffs cite Todd v. Missouri United School Insurance Council, 223 S.W.3d 156, 163 (Mo. 2007), for the proposition that inconsistencies should be resolved in favor of the insured. But that case also noted that "[i]nsur......
-
Nevils v. Grp. Health Plan, Inc., No. SC 93134.
...Lutsky v. Blue Cross Hospital Serv. Inc., 695 S.W.2d 870, 875 (Mo. banc 1985)). See also Todd v. Missouri United Sch. Ins. Council, 223 S.W.3d 156, 163 (Mo. banc 2007) (noting that Behr and Lutsky “involved contracts containing contradictory or necessarily inconsistent language in different......
-
Robert E. Levy, D.M.D., LLC v. Hartford Fin. Servs. Grp. Inc., Case No.: 4:20-cv-00643-SRC
...principles. Gohagan v. Cincinnati Ins. Co. , 809 F.3d 1012, 1015 (8th Cir. 2016) (citing Todd v. Mo. United Sch. Ins. Council, 223 S.W.3d 156, 160 (Mo. 2007). "In disputes over the meaning of contract language, ‘[t]he key is whether the contract language is ambiguous or unambiguous.’ " Id. ......
Request a trial to view additional results
214 cases
-
Allied Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Stuart, Case No. 4:16–CV–806 (CEJ)
...is made up of both the general insuring agreement as well as the exclusions and definitions." Todd v. Missouri United Sch. Ins. Council , 223 S.W.3d 156, 163 (Mo. 2007) (en banc). In construing the terms of an insurance policy, Missouri courts apply "the meaning an ordinary person of averag......
-
Nevils v. Grp. Health Plan, Inc., SC 93134.
...Lutsky v. Blue Cross Hospital Serv. Inc., 695 S.W.2d 870, 875 (Mo. banc 1985)). See also Todd v. Missouri United Sch. Ins. Council, 223 S.W.3d 156, 163 (Mo. banc 2007) (noting that Behr and Lutsky “involved contracts containing contradictory or necessarily inconsistent language in different......
-
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Tarrant, E2009–02431–SC–R11–CV.
...at 21–3 to –4. The declarations page summarizes the essential terms of an insurance policy. Todd v. Missouri United Sch. Ins. Council, 223 S.W.3d 156, 160 (Mo.2007) (en banc); Bergmann v. Hutton, 337 Or. 596, 101 P.3d 353, 359 (2004) (en banc). It is commonly understood that the declaration......
-
In re Generali COVID-19 Travel Ins. Litig., 20-md-2968 (JGK)
...resolved in favor of the insured. This argument is without merit. The plaintiffs cite Todd v. Missouri United School Insurance Council, 223 S.W.3d 156, 163 (Mo. 2007), for the proposition that inconsistencies should be resolved in favor of the insured. But that case also noted that "[i]nsur......
Request a trial to view additional results