Todd v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 85-247

Decision Date10 April 1985
Docket NumberNo. 85-247,85-247
PartiesJohn Wendell TODD, Petitioner, v. SOUTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company, and Equifax Services, Inc., Respondents.
CourtSouth Carolina Supreme Court

Kaye Gorenflo Hearn, Stevens, Stevens, Thomas, Hearn & Hearn, Loris, for petitioner.

E. Ellison Walker, J. Dwight Hudson, Harold W. Jacobs and John B. McCutcheon, Jr., for respondents.

Debora Faulkner, Robert T. Thompson, Herbert E. Buhl, III and Stephen J. Henry, for amicus curiae.

ORDER

Petitioner requests the Court to issue a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in Todd v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Ins. Co. et al., S.C., 321 S.E.2d 602 (S.C.App.1984) appealing after remand 276 S.C. 284, 278 S.E.2d 607. We grant the writ as to petitioner's first question only.

The Appendix shall be docketed as the Transcript of Record as of the date of this order. Appellant-Petitioner shall file eight additional copies of the Appendix by the deadline for filing the petitioner's brief. The materials in the Appendix are not required to be certified copies. The parties are directed to file briefs in accordance with Rule 8 of the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court, except only one original brief and nine copies shall be required. This matter shall proceed in conformity with the Court's rules.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Jones v. General Elec. Co.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 4 Mayo 1998
    ...276 S.C. 284, 278 S.E.2d 607 (1981), appeal after remand, 283 S.C. 155, 321 S.E.2d 602 (Ct.App.1984), writ granted in part, 285 S.C. 84, 328 S.E.2d 479 (1985), quashed, 287 S.C. 190, 336 S.E.2d 472 (1985). The termination of an at-will employee normally does not give rise to [a] cause of ac......
  • Prescott v. Farmers Telephone Co-op.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • 1 Junio 1999
    ...Co., 276 S.C. 284, 278 S.E.2d 607 (1981),appeal after remand, 283 S.C. 155, 321 S.E.2d 602 (Ct.App.1984), writ granted in part, 285 S.C. 84, 328 S.E.2d 479, quashed, 287 S.C. 190, 336 S.E.2d 472 (1985); Culler v. Blue Ridge Elec. Coop. Inc., 309 S.C. 243, 245, 422 S.E.2d 91, 92 (1992) (doct......
  • Small v. Springs Industries, Inc.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • 15 Mayo 1989
    ...276 S.C. 284, 278 S.E.2d 607 (1981), appeal after remand, 283 S.C. 155, 321 S.E.2d 602 (Ct.App.1984), writ granted in part, 285 S.C. 84, 328 S.E.2d 479 (1985), quashed, 287 S.C. 190, 336 S.E.2d 472 (1985). The termination of an at-will employee normally does not give rise to cause of action......
  • Prescott v. Farmers Tel. Coop.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • 1 Junio 1999
    ...Co., 276 S.C. 284, 278 S.E.2d 607 (1981), appeal after remand, 283 S.C. 155,321 S.E.2d 602 (Ct. App. 1984), writ granted in part, 285 S.C. 84, 328 S.E.2d 479 quashed, 287 S.C. 190, 336 S.E.2d 472 (1985); Culler v. Blue Ridge Elec. Coop. Inc., 309 S.C. 243, 245, 422 S.E.2d 9t, 92 (1992) (doc......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT