Tolliver v. New York City Housing Authority
| Decision Date | 10 April 1997 |
| Citation | 655 N.Y.S.2d 534,238 A.D.2d 187 |
| Parties | Rodney TOLLIVER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ivan M. Diamond, for Plaintiff-Respondent.
David Samel, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before WALLACH, J.P., and NARDELLI, RUBIN and WILLIAMS, JJ.
Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), entered on or about February 13, 1996, which denied defendant New York City Housing Authority's motion pursuant to CPLR 3212 for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted, and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant-appellant dismissing the complaint.
Plaintiff, a 15-year resident of defendant's building, alleges that he was accosted by an individual who demanded money while plaintiff was in the process of locking the door to his apartment. As plaintiff moved towards the man, whom he did not recognize as a resident of the building, the assailant shot him four times and fled. Finding the door at the back of the building bolted shut, the assailant ran back past plaintiff, striking him in the face with his gun, and made his escape down the stairs and out the front door.
Plaintiff acknowledged that he did not know precisely how the man had entered the building, which has 14 floors and contains 55 apartments. However, it is not disputed that the front door lock had been inoperable for approximately one week prior to the incident and that the lock cylinder had been removed. The assailant was never apprehended.
Both at a hearing conducted pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h and at a deposition, plaintiff testified that he doubted the assailant was a tenant of the building since he did not recognize him. As we noted in Maria S. v. Willow Enters., 234 A.D.2d 177, 651 N.Y.S.2d 486, 488, "absent proof of how the perpetrator gained entry to the premises, any negligence claim premised on the theory that the defendants' inadequate security measures permitted the intruder to gain access to the premises necessarily involves speculation on the issue of the proximate cause, and will not survive defendants' motion for summary judgment" (see also, Rivera v. Lazo, 230 A.D.2d 662, 646 N.Y.S.2d 797). Likewise, in Dawson v. New York City Hous. Auth., 203 A.D.2d 55, 610 N.Y.S.2d 28, we observed that "the failure to...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ortiz v. New York City Housing Authority
...v. New York City Housing Auth., 239 A.D.2d 114, 115, 657 N.Y.S.2d 32, 33 (1st Dep't 1997); Tolliver v. New York City Housing Auth., 238 A.D.2d 187, 188, 655 N.Y.S.2d 534, 535 (1st Dep't 1997); Folks v. New York City Housing Auth., 227 A.D.2d 520, 521, 643 N.Y.S.2d 179, 180 (2d Dep't 1996). ......
-
NYC Housing Auth. v. Housing Auth Risk Retention
...Sanchez). Finally, NYCHA cites Fowler v. New York City Hous. Auth, 663 N.Y.S.2d 32 (1st Dep't 1997) and Tolliver v. New York City Hous. Auth., 655 N.Y.S.2d 534 (1st Dep't 1997). These cases have little relevance as they were decided both after Sanchez and by another department. In addition,......
-
Burgos v. Aqueduct Realty Corp.
...Equities Co., 222 A.D.2d 201, 634 N.Y.S.2d 481, lv. denied 88 N.Y.2d 813, 649 N.Y.S.2d 380, 672 N.E.2d 606; Tolliver v. NYC Hous. Auth., 238 A.D.2d 187, 655 N.Y.S.2d 534; Melville v. NYC Hous. Auth., supra We share the trial court's concern that the rule we reaffirm here will benefit many l......
-
Cofield v. New York City Housing Authority
...City of New York, supra; see also, Fowler v. New York City Hous. Auth., 243 A.D.2d 284, 663 N.Y.S.2d 32; Tolliver v. New York City Housing Author., 238 A.D.2d 187, 655 N.Y.S.2d 534; Gleaton v. New York City Hous. Auth., 221 A.D.2d 504, 633 N.Y.S.2d ...