Touhey v. Carnivale Cruise Lines, ROSS-LOOS
| Citation | 111 Cal.App.3d 958,168 Cal.Rptr. 910 |
| Decision Date | 10 November 1980 |
| Docket Number | ROSS-LOOS |
| Parties | , 1981 A.M.C. 1218 Elita M. TOUHEY, individually and as Guardian for Michael Richard Touhey, a minor, David Steven Touhey, Donald Patrick Touhey, and John Kevin Touhey, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v.MEDICAL GROUP, Ross-Loos Medical Center, Ross-Loos Hospital, Carnivale Cruise Lines, TSS Carnivale, Defendants and Respondents. Civ. 58385. |
| Court | California Court of Appeals |
Laufer & Roberts and Kenneth P. Roberts, Encino, for plaintiffs and appellants.
Lillick, McHose & Charles, Francis J. MacLaughlin, and Michael J. Faber, Los Angeles, for defendant and respondent Carnivale Cruise Lines.
Elita M. Touhey, individually and as guardian ad litem for Michael Richard Touhey, a minor, David Steven Touhey, Donald Patrick Touhey, and John Kevin Touhey (appellants), filed a wrongful death action against defendants (respondents). The trial court dismissed the wrongful death action on the ground that the federal courts had exclusive jurisdiction under the Death on the High Seas Act. (46 U.S.C. § 761.)
In their complaints appellants allege that on June 24, 1976, John A. Touhey, the decedent, was injured while on board respondents' cruise ship and that such injury was the proximate cause of decedent's death. The injury occurred when the cruise ship was on the high seas beyond a marine league from the shore of the United States, its Territories or dependencies. Decedent died on June 11, 1977, in the State of California.
Appellants contend that jurisdiction is invoked under the Death on the High Seas Act only when the death itself occurs on the high seas. This contention has no merit.
It is clear that the place where the injury occurs is the crucial factor in determining whether or not the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. The Death on the High Seas Act, 46 United States Code section 761, provides:
"Whenever the death of a person shall be caused by wrongful act, neglect, or default occurring on the high seas beyond a marine league from the shore of any State, or the District of Columbia, or the Territories or dependencies of the United States, the personal representative of the decedent may maintain a suit for damages in the district courts of the United States, in admiralty, for the exclusive benefit of the decedent's wife, husband, parent, child, or dependent relative against the vessel, person, or corporation which would have been liable if death had not ensued."
The purpose of the Death on the High Seas Act is to...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bailey v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.
...5 (D.Del.1962); Echavarria v. Atlantic & Caribbean Steam Navigation Co., 10 F.Supp. 677 (E.D.N.Y.1935); Touhey v. Ross Fous Medical Group, 111 Cal.App.3d 958, 168 Cal.Rptr. 910 (1980); Cairl v. Boeing Co., 39 Cal.App.3d 137, 113 Cal.Rptr. 925 (1974); Gordon v. Reynolds, 187 Cal.App.2d 472, ......
-
Bergen v. F/V St. Patrick
...It is therefore irrelevant that some of the St. Patrick's crew may have died in territorial waters. See Touhey v. Ross-Loos Medical Group, 111 Cal.App.3d 958, 168 Cal.Rptr. 910 (1980) (applying DOHSA where decedent was injured aboard ship on the high seas, but died of his injuries more than......
-
Chromy v. Lawrance, B050102
...that the trial court had no subject matter jurisdiction to try the wrongful death and survivor claims. (Tuohey v. Carnivale Cruise Lines (1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 958, 960, 168 Cal.Rptr. 910; Cairl v. Boeing Co., supra, 39 Cal.App.3d at p. 139, 113 Cal.Rptr. 925; Gordon v. Reynolds, supra, 187 ......