Travelers Indem. Co. of America v. Morris
| Citation | 390 So.2d 464 |
| Decision Date | 25 November 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 80-13,80-13 |
| Parties | TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA, Appellant, v. Jacqueline MORRIS, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
High, Stack, Lazenby, Bender, Palahach & Lacasa and R. Scott Boundy, Miami, for appellant.
Flinn & Jennings and Gene Flinn, Miami, for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, SCHWARTZ and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
In 1977, the plaintiff-appellee secured a judgment against the appellant, Travelers, on a personal injury protection insurance claim. The trial court also awarded the plaintiff attorney's fees under Section 627.428, Florida Statutes (1977). The judgment and fee award were affirmed by this court, which also granted fees for the appellate services of the insured's counsel. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Morris, 360 So.2d 1262 (Fla.3d DCA 1978). Subsequently, the trial court entered the order now under review, 1 awarding $2,500 for additional post-judgment services rendered by the appellee's lawyer in the trial court. We reverse.
The present fee represents payment for counsel's efforts in (a) securing payment of the p. i. p. benefits required by the judgment and (b) settling the record of unreported pre-judgment proceedings for use in the initial appeal. The award was not authorized for either class of services. First, the clear terms of Sec. 627.428-which must, in any event, be strictly construed, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Smith, 366 So.2d 456 (Fla.4th DCA 1978)-permit fees only for services involved in obtaining a judgment against a carrier, and not for those required to effect compliance with, collection of, or execution upon that judgment. Lee v. Government Employees Ins. Co., 388 So.2d 346 (Fla.1st DCA 1980); see, Bohlinger v. Higginbotham, 70 So.2d 911, 916 (Fla.1954). Second, since we did not remand the issue to the lower tribunal as permitted by Fla.R.App.P. 9.400(b), the trial court lacked jurisdiction to award fees for services related 2 to the earlier appeal. 3 See, Winner v. Winner, 376 So.2d 924 (Fla.3d DCA 1979). The order below is therefore reversed and the cause remanded with directions to deny the appellee's motion for additional fees.
Reversed.
1 Pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(a)(4).
2 Proceedings, such as those involved here, for the settlement of the contents of an unreported hearing are obviously an integral part of the appellate, rather than the trial process. See, Fla.R.App.P. 9.200(b)(3).
3 It must be conclusively presumed...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Sugarman v. Galbut
...v. Gieseke, 499 So.2d 839 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Elswick v. Martinez, 394 So.2d 529 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Travelers Indem. Co. of Am. v. Morris, 390 So.2d 464 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). As concerns the rest of the attorney's fees, we are unable to determine from the final order, the basis of the attor......
-
H Greg Auto Pompano, Inc. v. Raskin
...a trial court cannot award attorney's fees for services rendered on an appeal.") (citations omitted); Travelers Indem. Co. of Am. v Morris, 390 So. 2d 464, 465 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), disapproved on other grounds by Pepper's Steel & Alloys, Inc. v. United States, 850 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 2003) ("[S......
-
Pepper's Steel & Alloys, Inc. v. US
...the settlement agreement. Id. Pepper's Steel appealed. Unable to reconcile conflicting language in Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Morris, 390 So.2d 464 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), and Bankers Security Insurance Co. v. Brady, 765 So.2d 870 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), the Eleventh Circuit asks us to ......
-
Aksomitas v. Maharaj
...specifically authorized to do so by the appellate court. Foley v. Fleet, 652 So.2d 962 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Travelers Indem. Co. of Am. v. Morris, 390 So.2d 464 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Appellate courts are thus required to rule on motions for prevailing party attorney's fees without knowing who......