Travelers' Ins. Co. v. Peake
Decision Date | 13 July 1921 |
Citation | 89 So. 418,82 Fla. 128 |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Parties | TRAVELERS' INS. CO. v. PEAKE. |
Error to Court of Record, Escambia County; C. Moreno Jones, Judge.
Action by Edward W. Peake against the Travelers' Insurance Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
Reversed.
Syllabus by the Court
Courts cannot enforce indemnity for losses from injuries resulting from risks excepted in the policy. Policies of insurance are designed to secure indemnity to the insured for losses or injuries stated in the policy, and the terms used should be so construed as to effectuate the purpose designed, ambiguous provisions being fairly construed in favor of the insured but parties sui juris are bound by their valid contracts, and where a particular risk is expressly and clearly excepted from the risks assumed by the insurer, the courts have no power to enforce indemnity for losses or injuries resulting from such excepted risks as expressed by the indemnity contract contained in the policy.
Airplane flying, whether insured operates the machine or not, is 'participating in aeronautics' within as accident policy exception. A passenger in an airplane flying in the air, whether he takes part in the operation of the airplane or not, is 'participating in aeronautics' within the intent and meaning of the provision specifically excepting such a risk from the indemnity contract contained in the policy herein.
Blount & Blount & Carter, of Pensacola, for plaintiff in error.
Judgment for the plaintiff was rendered on a demurrer to a declaration on an insurance policy, and defendant took writ of error.
The policy made a part of the declaration insured the plaintiff
The declaration alleges:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Missouri State Life Insurance Co. v. Martin
... ... of the plane. First Nat. Bank of Chattanooga v ... Phoenix Mut. Life Ins. Co., 62 F.2d 681 ... It ... appears here, however, that there was no ... to the insured should be adopted. Travelers' ... Protective Ass'n v. Stephens, 185 Ark. 660, ... 49 S.W.2d 364; National Life Ins. Co ... ...
-
Flanders v. Benefit Ass'n of Ry. Employees
... ... in the policy sued on. State ex rel. Security Mutual Life ... Ins. Co. v. Allen, 305 Mo. 607, 267 S.W. 379; Arms ... v. Faszholz et al. (Ft. Dearborn Casualty ... S.W. 923; Wendorff v. Mo. State Life Ins. Co., 318 ... Mo. 363, 1 S.W.2d 99; Travelers Ins. Co. v. Peake, ... 82 Fla. 128, l. c. 130. (2) The insured was engaged in ... aeronautics, ... ...
-
Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. Bowman
...such as "participating in," used in Bew v. Travelers' Ins. Co., 95 N.J.Law, 533, 112 A. 859, 14 A.L.R. 983, Travelers' Ins. Co. v. Peake, 82 Fla. 128, 89 So. 418, and Meredith v. Business Men's Acc. Ass'n of America, 213 Mo.App. 688, 252 S.W. 976. Not having done so, the expression "engaged......
-
Western Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. Meadows, 15413
...passengers 'at so much a trip, just to see Atlantic City, and for the novelty of the thing.' Also, in 1921, in Travelers Insurance Co. v. Peake, 82 Fla. 128, 89 So. 418, the Supreme Court of Florida, on the sole authority of the Bew case, held that a passenger in an airplane 'flying in the ......