Trevino v. Corrections Corp. of America, 08-92-00127-CV
Decision Date | 24 March 1993 |
Docket Number | No. 08-92-00127-CV,08-92-00127-CV |
Citation | 850 S.W.2d 806 |
Parties | Lisa TREVINO, Appellant, v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA d/b/a Reeves County Law Enforcement Center, Appellee. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Gerald K. Fugit, Odessa, for appellant.
Mary K. Wolf, Austin, for appellee.
Before KOEHLER, BARAJAS and LARSEN, JJ.
This is an appeal from an order granting a summary judgment in favor of the employer in a suit brought by an employee under Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 8307c for wrongful termination of the employment relationship in retaliation for having filed a workers' compensation claim six months prior to the date of termination. We reverse and remand.
Reeves County Law Enforcement Center (LEC) is a county owned correctional facility. Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) contracted with Reeves County in September 1988 to manage the facility. Lisa Trevino (Trevino) was an employee first of Reeves County and then of CCA when it took over management of the facility.
On June 18, 1989, Trevino injured her right shoulder while working for CCA at the facility. On July 1, 1989, Trevino went on disability leave and began receiving weekly compensation as well as payment of her medical bills from that date until November 30, 1990. While she was drawing compensation, she received a letter from CCA dated January 3, 1990, informing her that in accordance with CCA's corporate policy concerning injured employees receiving workers' compensation, she was to be terminated effective January 1, 1990. In December 1990, Trevino settled her workers' compensation claim for a lump sum. She then filed this suit in the district court of Reeves County, seeking damages for the wrongful termination of her employment. The trial court granted CCA's motion for summary judgment and rendered a take-nothing judgment against Trevino.
In a single point of error, Trevino asserts that the trial court erred in granting the summary judgment based upon CCA's claim that it was carrying out a neutral policy of terminating any employee whose workers' compensation period extended beyond six months, and upon the contention that she failed to establish the required causal connection between her termination and her claim for workers' compensation benefits.
When reviewing a summary judgment appeal, this Court must determine whether the successful movant in the trial court carried its burden of showing that there is no genuine issue of a material fact and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Company, Inc., 690 S.W.2d 546, 548 (Tex.1985). In deciding whether or not there is a disputed fact issue precluding summary judgment, evidence favorable to the non-movant is to be taken as true, and in that connection, every reasonable inference must be indulged in favor of the non-movant and any doubts resolved in her favor. Nixon, 690 S.W.2d at 548-49. If the defendant is the movant and it submits summary judgment evidence disproving at least one element of the plaintiff's case, then summary judgment should be granted. Bradley v. Quality Service Tank Lines, 659 S.W.2d 33, 34 (Tex.1983); Rayos v. Chrysler Credit Corporation, 683 S.W.2d 546, 547 (Tex.App.--El Paso 1985, no writ).
In her petition, Trevino alleged in effect that she was an employee of CCA, that she was injured and filed a workers' compensation claim and that she was wrongfully terminated as a result of her workers' compensation injury and her subsequent treatment, contrary to the provisions of Article 8307c of the annotated Texas statutes, resulting in her damages as alleged. Under the Texas Workers' Compensation Act, "[n]o person may discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any employee because the employee has in good faith filed a claim, hired a lawyer to represent him in a claim, instituted, or caused to be instituted, in good faith, any proceeding under the Texas Workmen's Compensation Act, or has testified or is about to testify in any such proceeding." Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 8307c, § 1 (Vernon Supp. Pamphlet 1993). 1
To prevail on a claim of wrongful termination under Article 8307c, an employee must establish a causal link between his discharge and the filing of a worker's compensation claim. Investment Properties Management, Inc. v. Montes, 821 S.W.2d 691, 694 (Tex.App.--El Paso 1991, no writ); Hughes Tool Company v. Richards, 624 S.W.2d 598, 599 (Tex.Civ.App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1981, writ ref'd n.r.e.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 991, 102 S.Ct. 2272, 73 L.Ed.2d 1286 (1982). However, she does not need to show that the workers' compensation claim was the sole cause of her termination; she need only show a causal connection between her discharge and her claim for benefits. Investment Properties, 821 S.W.2d at 694; Azar Nut Company v. Caille, 720 S.W.2d 685, 687 (Tex.App.--El Paso 1986), aff'd, 734 S.W.2d 667 (Tex.1987). Once the employee has established the causal link, the burden then shifts to the employer to show that the employee was discharged for a legitimate reason. Hughes, 624 S.W.2d at 599. Accordingly, CCA had the burden of showing by appropriate summary judgment proof that there was no causal link between Trevino's compensation claim and her termination, i.e. that the claim was not a determining factor in her discharge. Azar, 720 S.W.2d at 687.
In a CCA document covering corporate policy with respect to employee leave benefits, dated June 1, 1986, paragraph 3-5.4D has as its subject "Workers' Compensation." The first three subparagraphs deal with the length of time employees, who are receiving compensation benefits, will be carried in leave without pay status (six months), during which time they will not earn personal and sick leave time, will be carried on the company's group health and life insurance plan and will be...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Thomas v. LTV Corp.
...the plaintiff to prove that the filing of the claim was the sole cause for his dismissal. See Trevino v. Corrections Corp. of Am., 850 S.W.2d 806, 808 (Tex.App.--El Paso 1993, writ denied); General Elec. Co. v. Kunze, 747 S.W.2d 826 (Tex.App.--Waco 1987, writ denied). Nonetheless, the plain......
-
Quanaim v Frasco Restaurant
...America West Airlines v. Tope, 935 S.W.2d 908, 912 (Tex. App.-El Paso 1996, no writ) (citing Trevino v. Corrections Corp. of America, 850 S.W.2d 806, 808 (Tex. App.-El Paso 1993, writ denied)). Frasco does not show that Quanaim's allegations of negligence on the hotel's part were "essential......
-
Anderson v. American Airlines, Inc.
...the adverse employment action that the employee has suffered and the workers' compensation claim. Trevino v. Corrections Corp. of Am., 850 S.W.2d 806, 808 (Tex.App.--El Paso 1993, writ denied). The retaliation only needs to be a determining factor of the discrimination that an employee has ......
-
America West Airlines, Inc. v. Tope
...a causal link between the discharge and the employee's invocation of rights under the Act. Trevino v. Corrections Corp. of America, 850 S.W.2d 806, 808 (Tex.App.--El Paso 1993, writ denied). Plaintiff may show the causal connection by circumstantial evidence and by reasonable inferences ari......
-
Discrimination claims under labor code chapter 451
...compensation claims. See, e.g., Paragon Hotel Corp. , 783 S.W.2d at 658 (discouraged filing); Trevino v. Corrections Corp. of America , 850 S.W.2d 806, 808 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1993, writ denied) (termination policy); Parham v. Carrier Corp. , 9 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1993) (pattern of termi......
-
Discrimination Claims Under Labor Code Chapter 451
...compensation claims. See, e.g., Paragon Hotel Corp. , 783 S.W.2d at 658 (discouraged filing); Trevino v. Corrections Corp. of America , 850 S.W.2d 806, 808 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1993, writ denied) (termination policy); Parham v. Carrier Corp. , 9 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1993) (pattern of termi......
-
Discrimination Claims Under Labor Code Chapter 451
...compensation claims. See, e.g., Paragon Hotel Corp. , 783 S.W.2d at 658 (discouraged filing); Trevino v. Corrections Corp. of America , 850 S.W.2d 806, 808 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1993, writ denied) (termination policy); Parham v. Carrier Corp. , 9 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1993) (pattern of termi......
-
Table of cases
...1983), reh’g denied , 707 F.2d 515 (5th Cir. 1983), §§1:8.B.1, 1:8.C.2, 17:4.D.1, 23:1.B.1.a, 31:2.C Trevino v. Corrections Corp. of Am. 850 S.W.2d 806 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1993, writ denied), §§31:3.A.4.b, 31:3.B.1 Trevino v. Kent County , 936 S.W.2d 488, 493 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1996, writ d......