TSE Supply Co. v. Cumberland Natural Gas Co.
| Decision Date | 01 February 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 45496,45496 |
| Citation | 648 S.W.2d 169 |
| Parties | TSE SUPPLY COMPANY, Appellant, v. CUMBERLAND NATURAL GAS COMPANY, Respondent. |
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
John T. Sluggett, III, Clayton, for appellant.
Greg Hoffmann, Clayton, for respondent.
This is a contract action for the payment of steel pipe ordered by telephone by a nonresident buyer. The trial court dismissed seller's petition by reason of the lack of jurisdiction under § 506.500, RSMo. 1978 (long-arm statute). We affirm.
Seller is a Fenton, Missouri corporation. Buyer is a Tennessee corporation. Buyer had done no business in Missouri prior to the transaction in question.
Seller filed its petition against buyer in St. Louis County, Missouri for payment of steel pipe. Buyer filed a motion to dismiss along with supporting affidavits. Seller also filed its affidavits. There was no other evidence.
The trial court had jurisdiction to determine the extent of its jurisdiction over buyer in this matter. State ex rel. Peoples Bank v. Stussie, 536 S.W.2d 934, 939 (Mo.App.1976). In making its determination regarding jurisdiction, the trial court properly received the affidavits of buyer and seller, and had the authority and jurisdiction to determine the veracity of the statements made in such affidavits. Cloyd v. Cloyd, 564 S.W.2d 337, 343 (Mo.App.1978). If the affidavit submitted by buyer in support of its Motion to Dismiss shows that buyer did not commit any act sufficient to invoke the jurisdictional provisions of § 506.500, RSMo. 1978, the trial court's ruling must be affirmed. Flegel v. Holmes, 614 S.W.2d 779, 780 (Mo.App.1981).
From the State of Tennessee, buyer ordered the steel pipe by a telephone call to Missouri. It was ordered for shipment and was to be used in laying a pipe line in the State of Tennessee. In conjunction therewith, buyer arranged for a letter of credit to be sent from the North Park National Bank of Dallas, to seller in Missouri.
The question presented is whether seller has alleged sufficient facts to subject a Tennessee defendant to the personal jurisdiction of a Missouri Court. We believe the answer to be in the negative.
Both parties agree there were two "contacts" with Missouri. The first was an interstate phone order placed with Missouri seller by wholly owned subsidiary of defendant. The second was defendant's causing a letter of credit to be transmitted from a Texas bank to the seller in Missouri. The parties disagree, however, as to the effect of these...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. All Sports Arena Amusement
...Fort Scott, 8 S.W.3d 893, 904 (Mo.Ct.App. 2000); Farris v. Boyke, 936 S.W.2d 197, 201 (Mo.Ct.App.1996); TSE Supply Co. v. Cumberland Natural Gas Co., 648 S.W.2d 169, 170 (Mo.Ct.App.1983). However, Missouri courts have held the following consist of the "transaction of business" within the st......
-
Institutional Food Marketing Associates, Ltd. v. Golden State Strawberries, Inc.
...state on the part of the nonresident. Daewoo, 719 F.2d at 972; Scullin Steel, 676 F.2d at 312. See also TSE Supply Co. v. Cumberland Natural Gas Co., 648 S.W.2d 169, 170 (Mo.Ct.App.1983) (phone conversations and written correspondence are insufficient contacts to justify an exercise of pers......
-
Institutional Food v. Golden State Strawberries
...676 F.2d 309 (8th Cir.1982); Breiner Equipment Co. v. Dynaquip, Inc., 539 F.Supp. 204 (E.D.Mo.1982); TSE Supply Company v. Cumberland National Gas Company, 648 S.W.2d 169 (Mo.App.1983). Plaintiffs do contend that Coastal was the agent of GSS, not plaintiffs, and therefore GSS has sufficient......
-
Warner v. General Ins. Co. of America
...(a telephone order from one state to another is an insufficient basis for long-arm jurisdiction); TSE Supply Co. v. Cumberland Natural Gas Co., 648 S.W.2d 169, 170 (Mo.Ct.App.1983) (telephone conversations and written correspondence are an insufficient basis for long-arm jurisdiction). Ther......