Tuttle v. Mateo

Decision Date03 October 2014
PartiesIn the Matter of Susan TUTTLE, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Beth MATEO, Respondent–Respondent. (Appeal No. 1.)
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Ontario County (Maurice E. Strobridge, JHO), entered October 3, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the violation petition.

Davison Law Office PLLC, Canandaigua (Mary P. Davison of Counsel), for PetitionerAppellant.

Robert L. Gosper, Attorney for the Child, Canandaigua.

Same Memorandum as in Matter of Tuttle v. Mateo ( [Appeal No. 3] –––A.D.3d ––––, ––– N.Y.S.2d –––– [Oct. 3, 2014] ).

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, VALENTINO, WHALEN, and DeJOSEPH, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Tuttle v. Mateo
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 3, 2014
    ...L. Gosper, Attorney for the Child, Canandaigua. Same Memorandum as in Matter of Tuttle v. Mateo [Appeal No. 3], –––A.D.3d ––––, ––– N.Y.S.2d ––––, 2014 WL 4943990 (Oct. 3, 2014). It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, VALENTINO, ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT