TXO Production Corp. v. First Nat. Bank of Russellville, 85-108
Decision Date | 10 March 1986 |
Docket Number | No. 85-108,85-108 |
Citation | 705 S.W.2d 423,288 Ark. 338 |
Parties | TXO PRODUCTION CORPORATION, Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF RUSSELLVILLE, Appellee. |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
This is a suit by First National Bank of Russellville to recover royalties, penalties and attorney's fees under an oil and gas lease given to TXO Production Corporation. Shortly after suit was filed, TXO tendered royalties, and this action continued only as one for penalties and attorney's fees. The Trial Court found for the bank and TXO appealed. The case was transferred to this Court under Rule 29(1)(c) and (n). We are affirming the Trial Court.
The penalties were assessed under Act 269 of 1981 (Ark.Stat.Ann. § 53-525), which reads as follows:
[The assessment of the penalty is in a separate subsection.]
The oil and gas lease itself is not in evidence. However it is undisputed that gas production on the well in question started in early 1982. A portion of the gas was sold to Columbia Gas Transmission Service and other portions were sold to Arkansas Louisiana Gas Transmission Corporation. (ARKLA). It is undisputed that TXO assumed the obligation to pay royalties on gas production to the bank.
Arkla began taking deliveries of gas...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Howell Petroleum Corp. v. Samson Resources Co.
...to interpret section 53-525 in favor of the ... party entitled to receive lease proceeds" (citing, e.g., TXO Prod. Corp. v. First Nat'l Bank, 288 Ark. 338, 705 S.W.2d 423, 424-25 (1986) (holding that the time limits in section 53-525 begin to run as soon as the oil or gas is delivered, not ......
-
Atlanta Exploration, Inc. v. Ethyl Corp.
...appellants cite TXO Production Corp. v. Page Farms, Inc., 287 Ark. 304, 698 S.W.2d 791 (1985) and TXO Production Corp. v. First Nat'l Bank of Russellville, 288 Ark. 338, 705 S.W.2d 423 (1986). Although attorney's fees were affirmed on appeal in those two cases, the facts involved in those h......
-
Askins v. Askins, 85-165
... ... First, it gives the appellee the benefit of enhancement ... ...
-
CHAPTER 10 MARKETABLE TITLE: WHAT IS IT? AND WHY SHOULD MINERAL TITLE EXAMINERS CARE?
...Acts 1981, No 269, §1; 1983, No. 448. §1; A.S.A. 1947 §53-525 Cases Interpreting: TXO Prod. Corp. vs. First National Bank of Russellville 288 Ark. 338, 705 S.W.2d 432 (1986) Howell Petroleum Co. vs. Samson Resources Co. 903 F.2d 778 (10th Cir.-Ark., 1990) Atlanta Exploration, Inc. vs. Ethyl......