U.S. v. Galan

Decision Date25 April 1996
Docket NumberNo. 95-30491,95-30491
Citation82 F.3d 639
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arnoldo Ozuna GALAN, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Josette Louise Cassiere, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Shreveport, LA, for United States of America, plaintiff-appellee.

Robert Gregg Levitt, Denver, CO, for Arnoldo Ozuna Galan, defendant-appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana.

Before JOLLY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Arnoldo Ozuna Galan challenges the 37-month sentence he has received after pleading guilty to conspiracy to escape from a federal prison. He also disagrees with the district court's evaluation of additions to his base offense level. We find no error and affirm.

Galan first argues that the prosecution for conspiracy to escape is barred by double jeopardy concerns because he was punished in prison for the same conduct by being held in segregation subsequent to the offenses, being transferred to a higher security level facility, and losing good-time credit. Galan argues that this court has not reexamined its decision, issued before United States v. Halper, 490 U.S. 435, 448-50, 109 S.Ct. 1892, 1901-03, 104 L.Ed.2d 487 (1989), which concluded that prison disciplinary proceedings do not bar future criminal prosecutions. See, e.g., United States v. Bryant, 563 F.2d 1227, 1230 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 972, 98 S.Ct. 1616, 56 L.Ed.2d 65 (1978). While this court has not reviewed the issue in light of Halper and other Supreme Court punishment-related cases, however, four other federal circuit courts have rejected appellant's contention. United States v. Brown, 59 F.3d 102, 103-05 (9th Cir.1995); United States v. Hernandez-Fundora, 58 F.3d 802, 806-07 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 2288, 132 L.Ed.2d 290 (1995); Garrity v. Fiedler, 41 F.3d 1150, 1152-53 (7th Cir.1994); cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 1420, 131 L.Ed.2d 303 (1995); United States v. Newby, 11 F.3d 1143, 1144-46 (3rd Cir.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1841, 128 L.Ed.2d 468 (1994), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 111, 130 L.Ed.2d 58 (1994). We see no reason to disagree with their uniform conclusion.

Galan also argues that the district court erred in denying him a reduction for acceptance of responsibility and in increasing his offense level by finding him a leader in the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
27 cases
  • Campos v. Johnson
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Texas
    • March 21, 1997
    ...10, 109 S.Ct. at 1903 & n. 10; Missouri v. Hunter, 459 U.S. 359, 365-67, 103 S.Ct. 673, 678, 74 L.Ed.2d 535 (1983); United States v. Galan, 82 F.3d 639, 640 (5th Cir.1996), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 117 S.Ct. 179, 136 L.Ed.2d 119 (1996), (holding that the imposition of disciplinary sancti......
  • Hudson v. U.S.
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • December 10, 1997
    ... ... Galan, 82 F.3d 639(C.A.5) (challenge to prosecution for prison escape following prison disciplinary proceeding as violative of double jeopardy), cert. ied, 519 U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 179, 136 L.Ed.2d 119 (1996). 5. In his concurrence, JUSTICE STEVENS criticizes us for reexamining our Halper opinion rather than deciding the case on what he believes is the narrower Blockburger grounds. But the question upon ... ...
  • Turner v. Johnson
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • March 15, 1999
    ...v. Mayes, 158 F.3d 1215, 1220 (11th Cir.1998), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ____, 119 S.Ct. 1130, 143 L.Ed.2d 123 (1999); United States v. Galan, 82 F.3d 639, 640 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 867, 117 S.Ct. 179, 136 L.Ed.2d 119 (1996); Meeks v. McBride, 81 F.3d 717, 722 (7th Cir.1996); Hern......
  • U.S. v. Mayes
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • October 29, 1998
    ...that the District Court's assessment of its injuries was erroneous." Halper, 490 U.S. at 452, 109 S.Ct. 1892.9 See United States v. Galan, 82 F.3d 639 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 179, 136 L.Ed.2d 119 (1996); United States v. Hernandez-Fundora, 58 F.3d 802 (2d Cir.), c......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT