Uhrovick v. Lavine

Decision Date18 December 1974
Citation364 N.Y.S.2d 890,35 N.Y.2d 892
Parties, 324 N.E.2d 360 In the Matter of Francis UHROVICK, Respondent, v. Abe LAVINE, etc., Appellant.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Order affirmed, without costs, on the opinion by Mr. Justice Robert G. Main at the Appellate Division, 43 A.D.2d 481, 352 N.Y.S.2d 529.

All concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Holley v. Lavine
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • July 13, 1979
    ... ... at 236, in view of the insubstantial fiscal effect of giving a remedy to plaintiff's "minuscule sub-class" and the recognition by the New York courts of the propriety of retroactive relief in welfare benefits cases. See Uhrovick v. Lavine, 43 A.D.2d 481, 484, 352 N.Y.S.2d 529, 532 (3d Dept.), aff'd, 35 N.Y.2d 892, 364 N.Y.S.2d 890, 324 N.E.2d 360 (1974) ("to do otherwise would permit a state to violate Federal requirements with financial impunity ... "); Martin v. Lavine, 47 A.D.2d 731, 366 N.Y.S.2d 3 (1st Dept.1975), ... ...
  • Archibald v. Whaland
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Hampshire
    • August 18, 1976
    ... ... Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528, 94 S.Ct. 418 F. Supp. 993 1372, 39 L.Ed.2d 577 (1974); Rosado v. Wyman, 397 U.S. 397, 90 S.Ct. 1207, 25 L.Ed.2d 442 (1970) ... Application of Slochowsky, 73 Misc.2d 563, 342 N.Y.S.2d 525 (1973). See Jennings v. Lavine, 79 Misc.2d 176, 359 N.Y.S.2d 473 (1974); Uhrovick v. Lavine, 43 A.D.2d 481, 352 N.Y.S.2d 529, aff'd 35 N.Y.2d 892, 364 N.Y.S.2d 890, 324 N.E.2d 360 (1974) ...         In Slochowsky, ... ...
  • Burton v. Department of Health and Social Services of State of Wis.
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Court of Appeals
    • July 28, 1981
    ... ... Two New York courts have specifically authorized full retroactive AFDC payments without discussing the state regulation. Barton v. Lavine, 54 A.D.2d 350, 389 N.Y.S.2d 416, 418 (1976) (noting without discussion that "such a result is apparently mandated by Federal regulations"); Schimmel ... See also Uhrovick v. Lavine, 43 A.D.2d 481, 352 N.Y.S.2d 529, 532, aff'd, 35 N.Y.2d 892, 364 N.Y.S.2d 890, 324 N.E.2d 360 (1974) (retroactive benefits based solely on ... ...
  • Archibald v. Whaland
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • May 20, 1977
    ... ... See Gaither v. Sterrett, 315 F.Supp. 990 (N.D.Ind.), aff'd mem., 400 U.S. 922, 91 S.Ct. 187, 27 L.Ed.2d 182 (1970); Uhrovick v. Lavine, 43 A.D.2d 481, 352 N.Y.S.2d 529, aff'd., 35 N.Y.2d 892, 364 N.Y.S.2d 890, 324 N.E.2d 360 (1974). In one case a stepparent obligation ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT