Union & Mechanics' Club v. City of Atlanta
Decision Date | 19 August 1911 |
Citation | 71 S.E. 1060,136 Ga. 721 |
Parties | UNION & MECHANICS' CLUB v. CITY OF ATLANTA. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court.
Clubs and associations authorized by the tax act of 1909 (Civil Code 1910, § 933) to keep or permit to be kept in their club rooms intoxicating liquors, are such as are organized for the entertainment and comfort of their members, and not for gain and which have a fixed place of meeting, a definite organization, with a continuing existence, in contradistinction to an ephemeral gathering for a particular occasion, with no idea of permanency in the fellowship or constituency of its members.
The tax imposed is not an occupation or business tax, but is laid solely in the exercise of the police power of the state, and is not a license for the sale or for the keeping on hand of intoxicating liquors in any place prohibited by law.
In the absence of a clear delegation of power by the Legislature to impose and collect a tax on social clubs as a condition precedent to a license permitting them to keep on hand intoxicating liquors, a municipal corporation cannot exact such a tax, the city of Atlanta has no such power in its charter.
Inasmuch as the state, by the enactment of the general prohibition act, has made penal the sale of intoxicating liquors and the keeping on hand of such liquors at any public place or place of business, it is within the power of the city of Atlanta under its general welfare clause, to establish reasonable rules and regulations designed to regulate social clubs, so as to prevent their conduct in any other manner than as bona fide social clubs and to prevent any violation of the prohibition act.
The ordinance of the city of Atlanta, imposing a tax as a condition precedent to the issuance of a license to a social club, permitting it to keep on hand intoxicating liquor, is an effort to collect a tax not authorized by its charter, and is therefore void, and its enforcement will be enjoined.
(Additional Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)
A "place of business," as used in the prohibition act (Pen. Code 1910, § 426), is a place where a calling for the purpose of gain or profit is conducted.
Error from Superior Court, Fulton County; Geo. L. Bell, Judge.
Action by the Union & Mechanics' Club against the City of Atlanta. From an order refusing to continue an injunction pendente lite, plaintiff brings error. Reversed.
On January 19, 1911, the following ordinance was adopted by the mayor and general council of the city of Atlanta:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Deal v. State
... ... club, who orders intoxicating liquors for the use of its ... the city of Valdosta, which had paid the tax required by ... law. In Union & Mechanics' Club v. City of ... Atlanta, 136 Ga. 721, 71 ... ...
-
Teutonia Club v. Howard
... ... were construed in relation to each other in Union & Mechanics' Club v. Atlanta, 136 Ga. 721, 71 S.E ... 1060. In that case ... ...
-
Wright v. State
... ... member of a bona fide social club, which has paid the tax ... required by law as a condition ... social organization located in the city of Macon. It further ... appears that the club had paid ... members. Union & Mechanics' ub v. Atlanta ... ...
-
Wright v. State
...having paid the tax required by law, the club had the right to keep the liquor for the use of its members. Union & Mechanics' Club v. Atlanta, 136 Ga. 721, 71 S. E. 1060; Teutonia Club v. Howard, 80 S. E. 290. Judgment ...